Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 574 (0.03 seconds)
Documents citing The State vs Captain Jagjit Singh on 14 September, 1961

Anil Mahajan vs Commissioner Of Customs & Anr. on 4 February, 2000

The Supreme Court also opined that the general observations contained in the judgment in The State Vs. Captain Jagjit Singh (supra) with regard to the principles that should govern the grant of bail in the case of a non-bailable offence under the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code 1898 equally applied to the grant of bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code 1974 and that the legal position was not different under the new Code.
Delhi High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 55 - C Joseph - Full Document

Chandan Singh vs Yashvinder Chauhan on 17 September, 1993

There are other cases, namely, (1) State v. Captain Jagjit Singh, , and (2) State v. Jaspal SinghGill, , where orders of the High Court granting bail to the accused were set aside, considering the gravity of the offence with which the accused therein werecharged.The decision relied upon by Mr. Sood, reported as Bhagirath Singh Judeja v. State of Gujarat, 1984 Cr.L.J. 160with all respects, does not lay down any general principles asit is manifest that their Lordships of the Supreme Court did not approve the order passed by the High Court in cancellingbail, in view of the observations made in that order taking into consideration status of the victim of the incident, and such extraneous factors as place of incident being inside premises of a hospital and other allied circumstances.
Delhi High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Gurcharan Singh & Ors vs State (Delhi Administration) on 6 December, 1977

In dealing with the question of bail under Section 498 of the old Code under which the High Court in that case had admitted the accused to bail, this Court in The State v. Captain Jagjit Singh, (supra) while setting aside the order of the High Court granting bail, made certain general observations with regard to the principles that should govern in granting bail in a non-bailable case as follows "It (the High Court) should then have taken into account the various considerations, such as, nature and seriousness of the offence, the character of the evidence, circumstances which are peculiar to the accused, a reasonable possibility of the presence of the accused not being secured at the trial, reasonable apprehension of witnesses being tampered with, the larger interests of the public or the, State, and similar other considerations, which arise when a court is asked for bail in a non-
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 1057 - P K Goswami - Full Document

Anandraj S/O Menpal Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 28 October, 2025

12. As far as the judgment cited by the learned State counsel in State v. Captain Jagjit Singh (supra) is concerned, the said decision is clearly distinguishable on facts. In that case, the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that the High Court had failed to consider the relevant factors such as the nature and seriousness of the offence, the character of the evidence, circumstances peculiar to the accused, the reasonable possibility of the accused not being available for trial, and the fact that the accused therein was facing trial before the Sessions Court for an offence (Uploaded on 29/10/2025 at 03:08:10 PM) (Downloaded on 29/10/2025 at 10:03:58 PM) [2025:RJ-JP:43090] (12 of 15) [CRLMB-13203/2025] punishable with a maximum sentence of fourteen years. In contrast, in the present case, the petitioner is facing trial before the Magistrate Court, has already undergone incarceration for more than nineteen months, and even in the event of conviction, cannot be sentenced to more than seven years of imprisonment. Although the provisions of Section 480(6) BNSS are not applicable to the present proceedings since the charges have not yet been framed, the purpose and spirit of the said provision cannot be ignored, particularly when the accused has already undergone 19 months of imprisonment in a case triable by a Magistrate.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - A K Upman - Full Document

State Of Gujarat vs Lalji Popat And Ors. on 2 April, 1988

15. The aforesaid ratio nowhere lays down that while considering the bail application the Court should only consider whether there was likelihood of the accused fleeing from justice and tampering with the prosecution evidence. The Court has emphasized that due and proper weight should be bestowed on these two factors apart from others and there cannot be any inexorable formula in the matter of granting bail. The Court thereafter held that the following observations made by the Supreme Court in the case of State v. Captain Jagjit Singh AIR 1962 SC 253, equally apply to a case under Section 439 of the new Code and the legal position is not different under the new Code:
Gujarat High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 27 - M B Shah - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next