Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.51 seconds)
Documents citing Reserve Bank Of India & Ors vs C.N. Sahasranaman & Ors on 30 April, 1986

R.P. Aggarwal vs Reserve Bank Of India on 30 March, 2012

"The scheme for promotion of Staff Officers Gr.'A', annexed to Administration Circular No.8 dated 13th May 1972, stands modified as per the judgment dated 30th April 1986 of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.3234 of 1981 - Reserve Bank of India and others vs. C.N. Sahasranaman and others - affirming the modifications submitted by the Bank, which were also put to referendum among the Class III employees.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - K Kannan - Full Document

K.Tamilchelvi vs The President/Special Officer on 5 June, 2012

It was also pointed out that out of the very many teachers in the school, only three of them, the appellants before us, have refused to enter into an agreement with the first respondent and as observed by this Court in Reserve Bank of India v. C.N. Sahasranaman2 the fact that a few are not satisfied, is no ground for interference by court or for grant of relief in their favour when by and large the position adopted by the institution is found to be fair and just and is accepted by all other teachers. We find considerable merit in the submissions on behalf of the respondents. In the absence of a statutory provision, we are not in a position to agree with learned counsel for the appellants that interference by the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution is warranted in this case. We find on the whole that there has been just treatment of the teachers by the first respondent institution and there is no reason to interfere even on the ground that the appellants are being treated unfairly by their employer, the educational institution, or on the basis that this is a case in which the conscience of the court is shocked, compelling it to enter the arena to afford relief to the teachers.
Madras High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 1 - K Chandru - Full Document

Indo Farm Industries Ltd.,, Chandigarh vs Assessee on 22 March, 2012

21. The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in CIT V. Vidyut Corporation., 324 ITR 221 (Bom) appl ying the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Libert y India V. C IT (supra) in respect of interest received on the delayed payments of prices of goods held by the assessee held the same to be part of sale price and derived from undertaking and eligible for deduction u/s 80IB of the Act. The Bombay Hon'ble High Court held as under:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Atul Kumar Sharma And Ors. vs The Hon???Ble High Court Of Delhi &Ors. on 1 June, 2012

The court also heard the grievance of other parties who claimed that the benefit of the judgment was deprived as far as they were concerned. Having regard to these facts, and the history of the litigation, the court is un-persuaded by the submissions of applicants in CM 22133/2020, i.e. that their seniority in the post of AOJ cannot be altered under any circumstances. In this context this Court recollects the decisions of the Supreme Court which have held that in employment and service matters, it is not always possible to arrive at perfect solutions, which can satisfy all, and that adjustments are often made, to which incumbent officials have to submit. It was thus, held in Reserve Bank Of India & Ors vs C.N. Sahasranaman & Ors AIR 1986 SC 1830 that:
Delhi High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - S R Bhat - Full Document
1