Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.31 seconds)

Jampani Krishna Babu vs Canara Bank, on 4 December, 2020

Interpreting the unamended provision, in Ayishumma v. Hassan [2009 (3) KLT 399] and South Indian Bank Ltd. v. Union of India [2010 (4) KLT 657], this court held further that the only aspect to be seen by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, while exercising power under section 14 of the Act, is whether the property in respect of which assistance is sought is a secured asset. It is thereafter, the provision has been amended and the provisos to sub-section (1) and sub- section (1A) were introduced. The amendments have not made any change to the scheme of the provision. On the other hand, it is seen that the amendments were intended to 1 2018 (3) KHC 670 9 remove the ambiguity in the unamended provision as regards the jurisdiction of the competent authority exercising power under Section 14 of the Act. In the light of the amendments, before rendering assistance to the secured creditor, it is obligatory for the Chief Judicial Magistrate exercising power under section 14 of the Act to satisfy that the secured creditor has made a declaration in the form of an affidavit as regards matters specifically mentioned in the first proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 14. In other words, after the amendments, if the secured creditor does not file an affidavit declaring all the facts required to be declared in terms of the first proviso, the Chief Judicial Magistrate is not obliged to render assistance to them. The correctness or otherwise of the declaration, going by the scheme of the provision, is not a matter at all for the Chief Judicial Magistrate to adjudicate. As taking possession of the secured asset through the process under section 14 of the Act is also one of the measures contemplated under sub- section (4) of section 13 of the Act, the correctness, if any, of the declaration made by the secured creditor for the purpose of availing assistance under Section 14 of the Act is a matter for the Debts Recovery Tribunal exercising power under Section 17 of the Act to adjudicate upon, if raised.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - C P Kumar - Full Document
1