Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.27 seconds)
Documents citing Ramsiya Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 6 September, 2016

Satya Narayan Gupta vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 4 September, 2018

Reference has been made to the judgment of the Apex Court in State of U.P. & Ors. v. Dhirendra Pal Singh & Ors1., State of Jharkhand & Ors. v. Jitendra Kumar Srivastava2 and the Division Bench judgments of this Court in Ram Murti Pandey v. State of U.P. & Ors.3, Mohan Ram v. State of U.P. & Ors.4 and State of U.P. & Ors. v. Jai Prakash5 as also the judgment of learned Single Judge in Ramsiya Yadav v. State of U.P & Ors.6.
Allahabad High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 1 - S Agarwal - Full Document

Smt. Kalawati vs State Of U.P. on 1 April, 2022

Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that a first information report has been lodged by one Bhajan before Police Station-Atarra, District-Banda being FIR No. 0196 of 2020 on 17.10.2020 under above noted sections against the applicant, one nominated accused and one unknown person with an allegation that the complainant happens to be the resident of Teraba and when he had gone to his agricultural field, then he came to know that one of the named co-accused Ramsiya had got the sale deed executed with respect of the said piece of land in favour of wife of his brother-in-law and the applicant herein fraudulently also got the name registered in the revenue records and when pressure was been exerted to deliver the possession of the said land to the applicant, the same was resisted. Learned counsel for the applicant has sought to argue that the present case is nothing but a civil dispute wherein proper and appropriate remedy is to avail the remedy as available under common law. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that she has been falsely implicated in the case and roped in without there being any justification particularly in view of the fact that she was totally unaware of the aforesaid incident. Learned counsel for the applicant has further drawn the attention of the Court towards Paragraph no. 12, so as to contend that she has a daughter of two years old and further while referring to Paragraph no. 13, so as to contend that the applicant does not possess any criminal history and thus she is unnecessary languishing in jail since 02.12.2021. Learned counsel for the applicant has drawn the attention of the Court towards order dated 02.02.2022 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1421 of 2022 (Ramsiya vs. State of U.P.) wherein the co-accused has been granted bail.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1