Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.91 seconds)
Documents citing B.K. Sharma vs Bharti Eye Foundation on 20 August, 2009

Deepak Kumar vs Satguru Partap Singh on 18 March, 2015

In another judgment 2010(2) CPC 336 "B.K. Sharma versus Bharti Eye Fouundation & Anr.", it was observed that it was the Doctor, who is best judge to decide the treatment. In that case, blood sugar status and its effect on the patient. Merely that the patient did not respond favourably to the treatment does not prove that there was any 14 FIRST APPEAL NO. 196 OF 2012 negligence on the part of the Surgeon. Therefore, no case of medical negligence was made out against the respondent.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R.Muthukrishnan vs Apollo Hospitals Enteerprise Ltd,Rep ... on 26 May, 2015

54.     We have to take note of the following decisions of the Hon'ble National Commission in the case of V.K. Sharma vs. Bharti Eye Foundation & Anr. - II (2010) CPJ 94 (NC), where it is held that "just because the complainant not responded favourably to treatment, no negligence can be attributed to the opposite party", and in the case of Prabha Ojha vs. Neel Mani, reported in I (2010) CPJ 62 (NC), it is held as follows: "It is by now well settled that onus of proof is on the party who alleges medical negligence. This has further been elaborated in subsequent judgments that mere statement of parties are not enough; allegation of negligence has to be proved with the help of expert medical opinion.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1