Gaurav Pandey vs State on 25 July, 2022
It is profitable to quote the relevant portion of
Khandu Sonu Dhobi vs. State of Maharashtra (1972) 3 SCC 786 :-
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 60 (1.22 seconds)Central Bureau Of ... vs Manish Kumar on 7 September, 2018
The same view was taken in the State of Andhra Pradesh v. M. Venugopal, 1964 (3) SCR 742 and more recently in Khandu Sonu Dhobi v. State of Maharashtra(supra). The decisions of the Calcutta, Punjab and Saurashtra High Courts relied upon by Mr Anthony deal with different points: in any event to the extent they contain any observations against the view expressed by this Court in the decisions just cited those observations cannot be considered good law."
Sudershan Singh vs State Of H.P. And Another on 28 December, 2023
The same view was taken in
State of A.P. v. N. Venugopal [AIR 1964 SC 33]
and more recently in Khandu Sonu Dhobi v.
State of Maharashtra [(1972) 3 SCC 786]. The
decisions of the Calcutta, Punjab and
Saurashtra High Courts relied upon by Mr
Anthony deal with different points: in any
event, to the extent, they contain any
observations against the view expressed by
this Court in the decisions just cited those
observations cannot be considered good law."
Rajiv Goyal vs State Of H.P. And Another on 28 December, 2023
The same view was taken in
State of A.P. v. N. Venugopal [AIR 1964 SC 33]
and more recently in Khandu Sonu Dhobi v.
State of Maharashtra [(1972) 3 SCC 786]. The
::: Downloaded on - 28/12/2023 20:33:23 :::CIS
34
decisions of the Calcutta, Punjab and
Saurashtra High Courts relied upon by Mr
Anthony deal with different points: in any
.
Daulat Ram And Others vs State Of H.P. And Another on 9 January, 2024
The same view was taken in
State of A.P. v. N. Venugopal [AIR 1964 SC 33]
and more recently in Khandu Sonu Dhobi v.
State of Maharashtra [(1972) 3 SCC 786]. The
of
decisions of the Calcutta, Punjab and
Saurashtra High Courts relied upon by Mr
Anthony deal with different points: in any
rt event, to the extent, they contain any
observations against the view expressed by
this Court in the decisions just cited those
observations cannot be considered good law."
Bidyadhar Dolai vs The State on 20 December, 1991
AIR 1972 SC 958 (Khandu Sonu Dhobi v. State of Maharashtra) where the Court decided that where the trial of the case had proceeded to termination, the invalidity of the preceding investigation would not vitiate the conviction of the accused as a result of the trial unless the illegality in the investigation has caused prejudice to the accused, has settled the position of law in that regard.
Union Of India Etc., Rep.Thr.Supdt.Of ... vs T. Nathamuni on 1 December, 2014
The same view was taken in the State of Andhra Pradesh v. M.
Venugopal, 1964 (3) SCR 742 and more recently in Khandu Sonu Dhobi v. State
of Maharashtra (supra). The decisions of the Calcutta, Punjab and
Saurashtra High Courts relied upon by Mr Anthony deal with different
points: in any event to the extent they contain any observations against
the view expressed by this Court in the decisions just cited those
observations cannot be considered good law."
R.A.H. Siguran vs Shankare Gowda @ Shankara on 18 August, 2017
The same
view was taken in State of A.P. v. N. Venugopal
[AIR 1964 SC 33] and more recently in Khandu
Sonu Dhobi v. State of Maharashtra [(1972) 3
SCC 786]. The decisions of the Calcutta,
Punjab and Saurashtra High Courts relied upon
by Mr Anthony deal with different points: in any
event to the extent they contain any observations
against the view expressed by this Court in the
decisions just cited those observations cannot be
considered good law.”
Chain Lal & Others vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 12 July, 2024
The same view was taken in State of
A.P. v. N. Venugopal [AIR 1964 SC 33] and more
recently in Khandu Sonu Dhobi v. State of
Maharashtra [(1972) 3 SCC 786]. The decisions of the
Calcutta, Punjab and Saurashtra High Courts relied
upon by Mr Anthony deal with different points: in
any event, to the extent, they contain any
observations against the view expressed by this
Court in the decisions just cited those observations
cannot be considered good law."
Gopal & Ors vs State on 1 September, 2017
The same view was taken in the
State of Andhra Pradesh v. M. Venugopal 1964
(3) SCR 742 and more recently in Khandu
Sonu Dhobi v. State of Maharashtra (supra).