Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)

Shri Bhaguji Bayaji Pokale & Others vs Shri Kantilal Baban Gunjawate & Others on 6 November, 1997

7. From the above it is clear that the entries in revenue records can never form the basis of declaration of title with regard to immovable property. The learned Counsel also referred to another judgment of our Court Abasaheb Bali Gharge and another v. Bataji Ramhari Gharge. In this case the same issue has been considered by our Court and has taken a similar view that the mutation entries or the entries in the Record of Rights are made only for the fiscal purpose of recovering revenues. The said entries cannot amount to transfer of the title of the holder of the property in favour of the person in whose name the entries are made. The para No. 8 of the said authority reads as under;

Janabai Raghunath Khomane And Ors. vs Hirabai Malhari Atole And Anr. on 29 November, 2002

Their Lordships reiterated that position in law. It may also be noticed that there is a decision of this Court to the same effect where the learned single Judge of this Court in the case of Abasaheb Bali Gharge and Anr. v. Balaji Ramhari Gharge, 1996(1) Mh.LJ., 209, has observed that it is settled law that entries in record of rights are made only for the fiscal purpose of recovering revenue. That such entries would not amount to transfer of title of holder of property in favour of person in whose name the entries are made.
Bombay High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - S A Bobde - Full Document
1