Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.45 seconds)
Documents citing Louis Vuitton Malletier vs Kapil Pahuja & Ors on 16 January, 2018

The Ritz Hotel Limited vs . Canada Fly Consultancy & Ors. on 3 January, 2019

3.1 Ld. Counsel for plaintiff relied upon the judgment passed by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi titled as Bennett Coleman & Company Limited Vs. M. Akram Pasha CS(COMM) 828/18 and I. A. 5748/18 decided on dated 08.08.2018 and another judgment titled as Louis Vuitton Malletier Vs. Kapil Pahula and Ors CS(OS) 1320/14 decided on 16.01.2018 to claim his relief in terms of O VIII R 10 CPC.
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Puma Se vs . Uni­Qlo on 17 January, 2019

3.1 Ld. Counsel for plaintiff relied upon the judgments passed by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi titled as M/s Vini Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd. vs. M/s Abhay Enterprises & Others {CS (COMM) 1417/2016} decided on 01.10.2018; Sandisk LLC vs. Raj Enterprises & Others {CS (COMM) 990/2018 and IA No. 15226/2018} decided on 26.11.2018; Inter Ikea Systems B. V. & Others vs. Sham Murari & Others {CS (COMM) 104/2018 and IAs No. 26029/2014 & 26030/2014} decided on 07.09.2018 and Louis Vuitton Malletier vs. Kapil Pahuja & Others {CS (OS) 1320/2014} decided on 16.01.2018 to claim its relief in terms of Order 8 Rule 10 CPC. 4 Heard. Perused the records meticulously. I am of the considered view, plaintiff is entitled to a decree in its favour and against the defendant for the reasons stated as under.
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Puma Se vs . Redon Sports/Ganpati Sales (India) on 23 January, 2019

4 Ld. Counsel for plaintiff for relied upon the judgments passed by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi titled as M/s Vini Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd. vs. M/s Abhay Enterprises & Others {CS (COMM) 1417/2016} decided on 01.10.2018; Sandisk LLC vs. Raj Enterprises & Others {CS (COMM) 990/2018 and IA No. 15226/2018} decided on 26.11.2018; Inter Ikea Systems B. V. & Others vs. Sham Murari & Others {CS (COMM) 104/2018 and IAs No. 26029/2014 & 26030/2014} decided on 07.09.2018 and Louis Vuitton Malletier vs. Kapil Pahuja & Others {CS (OS) 1320/2014} decided on 16.01.2018 to claim its relief in terms of Order 8 Rule 10 CPC. 5 Heard. Perused the records meticulously. I am of the considered view, plaintiff is entitled to a decree in its favour and against the defendant for the reasons stated as under.
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Puma Se vs . Md. Umar Farooque on 23 January, 2019

3.1 Ld. Counsel for plaintiff relied upon the judgments passed by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi titled as M/s Vini Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd. vs. M/s Abhay Enterprises & Others {CS (COMM) 1417/2016} decided on 01.10.2018; Sandisk LLC vs. Raj Enterprises & Others {CS (COMM) 990/2018 and IA No. 15226/2018} decided on 26.11.2018; Inter Ikea Systems B. V. & Others vs. Sham Murari & Others {CS (COMM) 104/2018 and IAs No. 26029/2014 & 26030/2014} decided on 07.09.2018 and Louis Vuitton Malletier vs. Kapil Pahuja & Others {CS (OS) 1320/2014} decided on 16.01.2018 to claim its relief in terms of Order 8 Rule 10 CPC. 4 Heard. Perused the records meticulously. I am of the considered view, plaintiff is entitled to a decree in its favour and against the defendant for the reasons stated as under.
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1