4. The Ld. Counsel for the Appellant Shri M.N. Bharathi has
reiterated the contentions as specified in the Grounds of Appeal and further
5
submitted that in similar circumstances, CESTAT Chennai has set aside the
demand in the case of Ponni Sugars (Erode) Limited Vs. Commissioner of
Central Excise, Salem in Final Order No. 40391/2023 dated 18.10.2023
[2023 (10) TMI 876 (Tri.-Chennai)] and sought for setting aside the
impugned order dated 28.11.2014.
4. The Ld. Counsel for the Appellant Shri M.N. Bharathi has
reiterated the contentions as specified in the Grounds of Appeal and further
5
submitted that in similar circumstances, CESTAT Chennai has set aside the
demand in the case of Ponni Sugars (Erode) Limited Vs. Commissioner of
Central Excise, Salem in Final Order No. 40391/2023 dated 18.10.2023
[2023 (10) TMI 876 (Tri.-Chennai)] and sought for setting aside the
impugned order dated 28.11.2014.
4. The Ld. Counsel for the Appellant Shri M.N. Bharathi has
reiterated the contentions as specified in the Grounds of Appeal and further
5
submitted that in similar circumstances, CESTAT Chennai has set aside the
demand in the case of Ponni Sugars (Erode) Limited Vs. Commissioner of
Central Excise, Salem in Final Order No. 40391/2023 dated 18.10.2023
[2023 (10) TMI 876 (Tri.-Chennai)] and sought for setting aside the
impugned order dated 28.11.2014.
4. The Ld. Counsel for the Appellant Shri M.N. Bharathi has
reiterated the contentions as specified in the Grounds of Appeal and further
5
submitted that in similar circumstances, CESTAT Chennai has set aside the
demand in the case of Ponni Sugars (Erode) Limited Vs. Commissioner of
Central Excise, Salem in Final Order No. 40391/2023 dated 18.10.2023
[2023 (10) TMI 876 (Tri.-Chennai)] and sought for setting aside the
impugned order dated 28.11.2014.