Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.37 seconds)

Snapdeal Pvt. Ltd vs State Of Karnataka on 4 March, 2022

19. Learned High Court Government Pleader fairly replied to the query raised by the Court and stated that the State has not challenged the order passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Kunal Dahl (supra). Therefore, the said order of the learned Single Judge reached finality. Moreover, the learned High Court Government Pleader has not convinced this Court as to how the petitioners are liable for prosecution when there is an exemption from liability as provided under Section 79 of 20 the IT Act. It is not in dispute that accused No.1 is an intermediary as defined under Section 2(w) of IT Act. Under such circumstances, I do not find any reason to form a different opinion. Therefore, I am of the opinion that the petitioners have made out grounds for allowing the petitions.
Karnataka High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Flipkart Internet Private Ltd. vs State Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr. on 17 August, 2022

24. However, the petitioner claims protection under Section 79 of the I.T. Act, which is disputed by the respondents. The cited judgments, all relate to civil suits [except in Kunal Bahl and Anr. Vs State of Karnataka (Order dated 7th January, 2021 by the High Court of Karnataka in CRL.P 4676/2020)], where injunctions were claimed against the intermediaries. While considering the question of issuance of interim injunctions against intermediaries, the courts have discussed at length the availability of "safe harbour" protection provided under Section 79 of the I.T. Act. The need to discuss those judgments at length here is not felt.
Delhi High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - A Menon - Full Document

Make My Trip India Private Limited ... vs Anand Gupta S/O. Prafulla Gupta on 16 January, 2026

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Make My Trip India Private Limited ... vs Anand Gupta S/O. Prafulla Gupta on 16 January, 2026

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1