Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 56 (0.71 seconds)
Documents citing Mahadeo vs Sovan Devi on 30 August, 2022

Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. vs Src Company Infra Pvt.Ltd. on 14 November, 2025

56. The reliance placed by the majority Arbitrators on the 36 ::: Uploaded on - 14/11/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 14/11/2025 22:50:46 ::: Jt-CARBP-641&646-2021.doc minutes of the meeting of the Tender Committee, is misplaced. It is settled law that inter-departmental communications / file notings have no legal sanctity and/or do not create any enforceable rights. The judgment relied upon by the Petitioner-Respondent, namely Mahadeo Vs. Sovan Devi (supra) is apposite. It has been held that these inter-departmental communications are at best preparatory steps or expressions of tentative views. Unless notings culminate in a final decision, they cannot be relied upon as a basis for any legal right or liability.
Bombay High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - R I Chagla - Full Document

Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. vs Src Company Infra Private Limited on 14 November, 2025

56. The reliance placed by the majority Arbitrators on the 36 ::: Uploaded on - 14/11/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 14/11/2025 22:50:47 ::: Jt-CARBP-641&646-2021.doc minutes of the meeting of the Tender Committee, is misplaced. It is settled law that inter-departmental communications / file notings have no legal sanctity and/or do not create any enforceable rights. The judgment relied upon by the Petitioner-Respondent, namely Mahadeo Vs. Sovan Devi (supra) is apposite. It has been held that these inter-departmental communications are at best preparatory steps or expressions of tentative views. Unless notings culminate in a final decision, they cannot be relied upon as a basis for any legal right or liability.
Bombay High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - R I Chagla - Full Document

Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. vs Src Company Infra Private Limited on 14 November, 2025

56. The reliance placed by the majority Arbitrators on the 36 ::: Uploaded on - 14/11/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 14/11/2025 22:50:45 ::: Jt-CARBP-641&646-2021.doc minutes of the meeting of the Tender Committee, is misplaced. It is settled law that inter-departmental communications / file notings have no legal sanctity and/or do not create any enforceable rights. The judgment relied upon by the Petitioner-Respondent, namely Mahadeo Vs. Sovan Devi (supra) is apposite. It has been held that these inter-departmental communications are at best preparatory steps or expressions of tentative views. Unless notings culminate in a final decision, they cannot be relied upon as a basis for any legal right or liability.
Bombay High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - R I Chagla - Full Document

Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. vs Src Company Infra Pvt.Ltd. on 14 November, 2025

56. The reliance placed by the majority Arbitrators on the 36 ::: Uploaded on - 14/11/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 14/11/2025 22:50:48 ::: Jt-CARBP-641&646-2021.doc minutes of the meeting of the Tender Committee, is misplaced. It is settled law that inter-departmental communications / file notings have no legal sanctity and/or do not create any enforceable rights. The judgment relied upon by the Petitioner-Respondent, namely Mahadeo Vs. Sovan Devi (supra) is apposite. It has been held that these inter-departmental communications are at best preparatory steps or expressions of tentative views. Unless notings culminate in a final decision, they cannot be relied upon as a basis for any legal right or liability.
Bombay High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - R I Chagla - Full Document

Sri Ramapati Chakraborty vs The State Of Tripura And Ors on 29 April, 2025

8. Mr. Somik Deb, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant, made an attempt to draw the attention of this Court to documents placed on record which are office notes of the concerned Departments. However, only selected pages have been filed, and it is not possible for this Court to take cognizance of the office notes of the concerned Department, though the same were obtained by certified copy under the RTI Act and placed on record. Page 4 of 5 It is needless to observe that, under the writ of mandamus, the impugned orders and any counter affidavits filed by the concerned respondents in support of their claim need to be considered. However, office notes of the respondent-Department carry no weightage. The same principle is supported by the Judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Mahadeo and Ors. vs. Sovan Devi and Ors(supra).
Tripura High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - T A Goud - Full Document

Sandeep Dabas vs Gnctd on 4 March, 2024

4. Learned counsel for the respondents vehemently opposes this impression and states that no formal communication has been made to the applicants in this regard. He further submits that mere file noting cannot be treated as an impugned order which was not even conveyed to the applicants and hence, the OA is void ab initio and doesn't fulfil the characteristics as per the statute. He draws strength to his contention vide ratio laid down in the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India dated 30.08.2022 in CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5876 OF 2022 (ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) NO. 20839 OF 2021) in the matter of MAHADEO & ORS. versus SMT. SOVAN DEVI & ORS. and highlights the following paras:-
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next