Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (1.95 seconds)
Documents citing Shahbuddin vs State (Nct) Of Delhi on 25 May, 2017

Abdul Rab vs Narcotic Control Bureau on 3 April, 2025

45. Likewise, in the case of Rizwan vs. State of NCT of Delhi, Bail Application No. 2800/23, this Court opined that various courts have recognized that prolonged incarceration undermines the right to life, and liberty, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and Signature Not Verified BAIL APPLN. 592/2025 Digitally Signed By:ANIL Page 11 of 13 KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:16.04.2025 11:06:07 therefore, conditional liberty must take precedence over the statutory restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
Delhi High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - N B Krishna - Full Document

Shaji @ Kochu Shaji vs State Of Kerala on 6 August, 2024

● The reliance placed by the prosecution on Exts.P33, P57 and P58 FSL reports is wholly misplaced as the said reports are wholly unreliable. While in Ext.P33 report it is stated that a tuft of cut black hair found from the Hair Salon is similar to that of the scalp hair taken from the deceased, there is nothing to suggest that the tuft of hair taken from the Salon was actually that of the deceased especially when it is nobody's case that there were no other customers who had visited the Salon that day. Further, the FSL report only states that the hair samples were similar and not identical. Reliance is placed on the decisions in Fr. George Cherian v. State of Kerala - [1989 KHC 663]; Shahbuddin v. The State (NCT of Delhi) - [ILR (2001) II Delhi 845]; Muhammed Yousuf @ Sajid and Anr v. State of Kerala - [2022 KHC Online 136]; Biju Kumar v. State of Kerala - [2022 (1) KHC 463].
Kerala High Court Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - A K Nambiar - Full Document

Ajithkumar @ Ammakkoru Makan @ Soju vs State Of Kerala on 6 August, 2024

● The reliance placed by the prosecution on Exts.P33, P57 and P58 FSL reports is wholly misplaced as the said reports are wholly unreliable. While in Ext.P33 report it is stated that a tuft of cut black hair found from the Hair Salon is similar to that of the scalp hair taken from the deceased, there is nothing to suggest that the tuft of hair taken from the Salon was actually that of the deceased especially when it is nobody's case that there were no other customers who had visited the Salon that day. Further, the FSL report only states that the hair samples were similar and not identical. Reliance is placed on the decisions in Fr. George Cherian v. State of Kerala - [1989 KHC 663]; Shahbuddin v. The State (NCT of Delhi) - [ILR (2001) II Delhi 845]; Muhammed Yousuf @ Sajid and Anr v. State of Kerala - [2022 KHC Online 136]; Biju Kumar v. State of Kerala - [2022 (1) KHC 463].
Kerala High Court Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - A K Nambiar - Full Document

Biju @ Bijukuttan vs State Of Kerala on 6 August, 2024

● The reliance placed by the prosecution on Exts.P33, P57 and P58 FSL reports is wholly misplaced as the said reports are wholly unreliable. While in Ext.P33 report it is stated that a tuft of cut black hair found from the Hair Salon is similar to that of the scalp hair taken from the deceased, there is nothing to suggest that the tuft of hair taken from the Salon was actually that of the deceased especially when it is nobody's case that there were no other customers who had visited the Salon that day. Further, the FSL report only states that the hair samples were similar and not identical. Reliance is placed on the decisions in Fr. George Cherian v. State of Kerala - [1989 KHC 663]; Shahbuddin v. The State (NCT of Delhi) - [ILR (2001) II Delhi 845]; Muhammed Yousuf @ Sajid and Anr v. State of Kerala - [2022 KHC Online 136]; Biju Kumar v. State of Kerala - [2022 (1) KHC 463].
Kerala High Court Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - A K Nambiar - Full Document

Anilkumar @ Jacky vs State Of Kerala on 6 August, 2024

● The reliance placed by the prosecution on Exts.P33, P57 and P58 FSL reports is wholly misplaced as the said reports are wholly unreliable. While in Ext.P33 report it is stated that a tuft of cut black hair found from the Hair Salon is similar to that of the scalp hair taken from the deceased, there is nothing to suggest that the tuft of hair taken from the Salon was actually that of the deceased especially when it is nobody's case that there were no other customers who had visited the Salon that day. Further, the FSL report only states that the hair samples were similar and not identical. Reliance is placed on the decisions in Fr. George Cherian v. State of Kerala - [1989 KHC 663]; Shahbuddin v. The State (NCT of Delhi) - [ILR (2001) II Delhi 845]; Muhammed Yousuf @ Sajid and Anr v. State of Kerala - [2022 KHC Online 136]; Biju Kumar v. State of Kerala - [2022 (1) KHC 463].
Kerala High Court Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - A K Nambiar - Full Document

C.I. Kishore vs State Of Kerala on 6 August, 2024

● The reliance placed by the prosecution on Exts.P33, P57 and P58 FSL reports is wholly misplaced as the said reports are wholly unreliable. While in Ext.P33 report it is stated that a tuft of cut black hair found from the Hair Salon is similar to that of the scalp hair taken from the deceased, there is nothing to suggest that the tuft of hair taken from the Salon was actually that of the deceased especially when it is nobody's case that there were no other customers who had visited the Salon that day. Further, the FSL report only states that the hair samples were similar and not identical. Reliance is placed on the decisions in Fr. George Cherian v. State of Kerala - [1989 KHC 663]; Shahbuddin v. The State (NCT of Delhi) - [ILR (2001) II Delhi 845]; Muhammed Yousuf @ Sajid and Anr v. State of Kerala - [2022 KHC Online 136]; Biju Kumar v. State of Kerala - [2022 (1) KHC 463].
Kerala High Court Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - A K Nambiar - Full Document

State Of Kerala vs Anilkumar @ Jacky on 6 August, 2024

● The reliance placed by the prosecution on Exts.P33, P57 and P58 FSL reports is wholly misplaced as the said reports are wholly unreliable. While in Ext.P33 report it is stated that a tuft of cut black hair found from the Hair Salon is similar to that of the scalp hair taken from the deceased, there is nothing to suggest that the tuft of hair taken from the Salon was actually that of the deceased especially when it is nobody's case that there were no other customers who had visited the Salon that day. Further, the FSL report only states that the hair samples were similar and not identical. Reliance is placed on the decisions in Fr. George Cherian v. State of Kerala - [1989 KHC 663]; Shahbuddin v. The State (NCT of Delhi) - [ILR (2001) II Delhi 845]; Muhammed Yousuf @ Sajid and Anr v. State of Kerala - [2022 KHC Online 136]; Biju Kumar v. State of Kerala - [2022 (1) KHC 463].
Kerala High Court Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - A K Nambiar - Full Document
1