The vs The State Of Maharashtra) on 22 January, 2011
In an alike situation, while considering the question of second application for anticipatory bail after cancellation of earlier order of granting of anticipatory bail, this Court in 2003 CRL LJ 4167 (Rajesh Ramrao Raut vs The State of Maharashtra) (cited supra), held that the second application for anticipatory bail is maintainable by relying on a judgment reported in 1989 1 Crimes 524 Rajasthan (Gheesya vs State of Rajasthan) This court categorically held that if additional grounds are raised, the court can very well take up the second petition to go into the question of granting anticipatory bail. Therefore, I am of the considered view that there is no bar in filing a second application for anticipatory bail on additional grounds or on change of circumstances.