Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.23 seconds)

State vs . Rakesh Kumar Fir No.188/13 on 29 June, 2019

Thereafter, he came back to the spot and on the basis of DD Entry, prepared the rukka/Ex.PW6/B and handed over the same to Constable Pradeep for registration of the FIR. Accordingly, he went to the police station along with copy of rukka and after registration of FIR came to the spot and handed over the copy to him. He prepared the site plan on his own/Ex.PW6/C and also taken the photographs of the spot by mobile phone. Both the vehicles were seized vide seizure memo of the dumper Ex.PW6/D and car Ex.PW6/E. Meanwhile, he received information through Duty Page No.5 of 17 State vs. Rakesh Kumar FIR No.188/13 Officer vide DD no.9 about the death of injured. Thereafter, they returned to police station and deposited the case property in the Malkhana. Next morning, he went to SGM hospital alongwith the relative of deceased whose name he does not remember. The dead body of deceased was identified and he recorded the statement of identification vide statement of Chander Kant/Ex.PW6/F and Devender/Ex.PW2/A. Postmortem was conducted and thereafter, the dead body was handed over to the relative of deceased vide Ex.PW2/B. He stated that on 06.09.2013, he gave notice under section 133 of MV Act to Rakesh Kumar/Ex.PW6/G. In response to the notice, accused came to the police station and stated that he was driving the dumper at the time of accident. One person namely Chander Kant came to the police station and claimed to have witnessed the accident. He arrested the accused in the presence of Chander Kant vide arrest memo Ex.PW1/C. He identified the accused in the court.
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1