Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.21 seconds)

Bhola @ Iqbal vs State Of U.P. on 2 April, 2024

It is further argued that co-accused Hakimuddin @ Patley has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 09.06.2021 passed in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 13506 of 2021 (Hakimuddin @ Patley Vs. State of U.P.), copy of the order is annexed as annexure S.A.-2 to the supplementary affidavit. It is argued that the said co-accused was granted bail in his second bail application after his first bail application was rejected vide order dated 15.10.2020 by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court. It is further argued that the criminal history of the applicant has been disclosed and explained in para 18 of the affidavit in support of the bail application and in all the eight cases, the applicant is falsely implicated. It is argued that as such the applicant be released on bail. The applicant is in jail since 14.03.2019.
Allahabad High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - S Gopal - Full Document

Bhola Alias Iqbal vs State Of U.P. on 11 August, 2025

It is further argued that co-accused Hakimuddin @ Patley has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 09.06.2021 passed in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 13506 of 2021 (Hakimuddin @ Patley Vs. State of U.P.), copy of the order is annexed as annexure S.A.-2 to the supplementary affidavit. It is argued that the said co-accused was granted bail in his second bail application after his first bail application was rejected vide order dated 15.10.2020 by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court. It is further argued that the criminal history of the applicant has been disclosed and explained in para 18 of the affidavit in support of the bail application and in all the eight cases, the applicant is falsely implicated. It is argued that as such the applicant be released on bail. The applicant is in jail since 14.03.2019.
Allahabad High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - S Gopal - Full Document
1