Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.26 seconds)
Documents citing Indravadan Killawalla And Others vs State Of Maharashtra And Others on 5 July, 1988

Muzib­Ur­Rehman vs The State on 16 February, 2012

J. 1253 Indravadan Killawalla & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. wherein interalia it was observed that " where the reports with respect to the allegations against the parties were of trifling incidents and more in the nature of trial of nerves between two parties determined to get at each other's throats, to check this sort of behaviour is not the object of section 107 of Cr.P.C. . Two individuals have nothing to do with public tranquility or breach of peace which dispute is purely of civil nature."
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Ram Piary W/O Sh. Rati Ram vs The State on 7 January, 2012

J. 1253 Indravadan Killawalla & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. wherein interalia it was observed that " where the reports with respect to the allegations against the parties were of trifling incidents and more in the nature of trial of nerves between two parties determined to get at each other's throats, to check this sort of behaviour is not the object of section 107 of Cr.P.C. . Two individuals have nothing to do with public tranquility or breach of peace which dispute is purely of civil nature." Both the abovesaid authorities are squarely applicable on the facts of instant case as well.
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ms. Vidyawati D/O Lt. Jeevan Chand vs The State on 7 February, 2012

J. 1253 Crl. Rev. No. 171/2011 3/5 Indravadan Killawalla & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. wherein interalia it was observed that " where the reports with respect to the allegations against the parties were of trifling incidents and more in the nature of trial of nerves between two parties determined to get at each other's throats, to check this sort of behaviour is not the object of section 107 of Cr.P.C. . Two individuals have nothing to do with public tranquility or breach of peace which dispute is purely of civil nature."
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Amiya Sharma And Anr vs . State on 17 April, 2010

L. J. 218 ¼ ³ ®=± Á ¬ ®=¨¦'§ ¨y®,­"¯ ®%¦P» ´ ±8¨h¬ ²’¦'§ ¨ ³ ´8²*¬(ª'½Œ» ¦ ³ ¬ ´_ª*¨"±8¨ ³ © ¨"¼ ¯8« ¦'§ ¨RÌs»"À#³ ®%¦'ªY» ¦*¨Í¬(´“¾ƒ§ ³ ± § § ¨Xª*¨#» ± § ¨ ¼v®z» ¦ ³ ®%²Y» ±a¦ ³ ¬(´ » ´,¼&³ ®8®,­ ¨X´ ¬ ¦ ³ ±8¨0¤ ̃¬(ª*¨ ¬ © ¨(ªFΉ®,§ ¬,¾:± » ­ ®=¨…´ ¬ ¦'³ ±8¨Q¾ »#® » Á ®=¬q»q±a« ± Á ¬ ®%¦H« Á ¨"¼›´ ¬ ¦'³ ±8¨0¤ Ë ¨ Á ³ » ´ ±8¨Ï¾†»"®–» Á ®=¬›¿ ÁO» ±8¨ ¼›¬ ´ Indravadan Killawalla and others Vs. State of Maharashtra and others 1989 Cri. L.J. ഐ¦'§ ³ ®ˆ± »#®=¨h¦F§,¨R¿ ª*¬"±8¨"¨ ¼ ³ ´ À"® ¾ ¨ ª*¨R®=¨ ¦o»"® ³ ¼"¨v¯8«¦'§ ¨VÄ ¬(´,Å ¯ Á ¨VÄf³ À §Ž¹o¬(­"ªH¦ 1253.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1