Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 97 (0.68 seconds)
Documents citing K.M.Mishra vs Central Bank Of India & Ors on 16 September, 2008

Coram vs Union Of India And Others on 31 January, 2014

When the petitions in SLP (Civil) No.15770/2009, now converted to Appeal Civil No.2872 of 2010 (Union of India vs. A.K.Goel and others) were called for hearing, the Supreme Court has taken note of the apparent conflict between the decisions of the Honble Court in Dev Dutt case on one hand and the judgments of Supreme Court in Satya Narain Shukla Vs. UOI 2006(9) SCC 69 and K.M.Mishra vs. Central Bank of India & ors 2008(9) SCC 120 on the other hand and by their Order dated 29.03.2010, the Honble Court has referred these appeals to a Larger Bench (copy attached).
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Priya Punj Gupta vs Union Of India on 2 April, 2024

16. As noted earlier, in the case of Sukhdev Singh's case (supra), a three-Judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, declared the view taken in Dev Dutt's case (supra) to be legally sound and the decisions in Satya Narain Shukla's case and K.M. Mishra's (supra) other decisions of this Court taking a contrary view are declared to be not laying down a good law. In view of this, the stand taken by the respondents in support of the DoP&T's O.M. dated 13.4.2010 (Annexure A-1) and the communication dated 8.6.2012, which are impugned in the O.A., is untenable."
Central Administrative Tribunal - Lucknow Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Central Administrative Tribunal vs The Union Of India on 15 March, 2013

By the impugned order the Division Bench dismissed the writ petition. While doing so, it took cognizance of the judgments of this Court in  Dev Dutt v. Union of India (2008) 8 SCC 725,  Satya Narain Shukla v. Union of India 2006 (5) SCALE 627, 15 OA 442/2011  K.M.Mishra v. Central Bank of India (2008) 9 SCC 120,  Abhijit Ghosh Dastidar v. Union of India, (2009) 16 SCC 146  order dated 24.11.2009 passed in Civil Appeal No.5319/2003 Union of India v. J.S.Garg,  order dated 29.11.2010 passed in Union of India v. Ranjana Kale SLP(C) No.29929/2010 and  order dated 16.3.2012 passed in Civil Appeal No.6937/2011 Union of India v. N.K.Bhola and  took cognizance of the fact that Sunil Mathur's case (SLP(C) No.7623/2011) was dismissed on 24.1.2012 in the light of the judgment in Abhijit Ghosh Dastidar (supra) and held that there is no valid ground to interfere with the order of the Tribunal.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Union Of India And Anr vs R N Kurmi & Ors on 31 May, 2012

7. It was, therefore, contended by the learned counsel for the respondents that the decision of this court in K. M. Dixit (supra), interpreting the Supreme Court decision in Abhijit Ghosh Dastidar (supra), would no longer hold good in view of the fact that subsequently the Supreme Court in the case of Sunil Mathur (supra) as also in the case of N. K. Bhola (supra), have accepted and applied the view taken by the Supreme Court in Abhijit Ghosh Dastidar (supra) of ignoring the below benchmark ACRs.
Delhi High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 4 - B D Ahmed - Full Document

K.Muthuraj vs Indian Overseas Bank on 28 January, 2014

When the petitions in SLP (Civil) No.15770/2009, now converted to Appeal Civil No.2872 of 2010 (Union of India v. A.K.Goel & Ors.) were called for hearing, the Supreme Court has taken note of the apparent conflict between the decision of the Hon'ble Court in Dev Dutt case on one hand and the judgments of Supreme Court in Satya Narain Shukla Vs. UOI 2006 (9) SCC 69 and K.M.Mishra v. Central Bank of India & Ors. 2008 (9) SCC 120 on the other hand and by their Order dated 29.03.2010, the Hon'ble Court has referred these appeals to a Larger Bench (copy attached).
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - M Venugopal - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next