Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.28 seconds)

Manmohan Kumarpunia vs Food Safety Officer on 21 March, 2024

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that admittedly, the tobacco substance was seized by the respondent from the second accused and thereafter, the sample was sent for analysis. The said tobacco product is not illegal in the State of Haryana. It is only illegal in the State of Tamil Nadu. As to how those banned substances came into the possession of the seller/A1 in Tamil Nadu, has to be established before the court. However, in the present case, that was not established before this Court and a similar issue was considered before this Court in a batch of petitions in Crl.O.P.Nos.16293 of 2023 etc batch, dated 18.08.2023 [M/s.S.S.Essence Private Limited VS. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by K.Chandran, Food Safety Officer] and in order to avail the very same benefit, the petitioner has filed the present petition before this Court.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - M Dhandapani - Full Document
1