Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.36 seconds)

Harsh Wood Products Pvt. Ltd. vs Bank Of India on 17 May, 1996

18. In this background, the trial court while passing the impugned orders simply observed that the amount claimed by the plaintiff was a large sum. Although the balance sum was very less, but adding the compound interest, it has become a huge amount, unbearable by the petitioner/ defendant, The trial court considered the implications of the cases of Abdul Salim Qureshi v. Mohd. Habib [1983] MPLJ SN 35, Bal Chyasi v. Ujjala [1973] JLJ 581, Ibrahim v. Abid Ali [1988] I WN 219, Presto Lights of India v. Union Bank of India [1986] BJ 411, Balrampur Sugar Co. v. Chalchitra Bharati, AIR 1981 Cal 23, and Kamala Choube (Smt.) v. Punjab National Bank [1991] 1 WN 125,
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1