Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.34 seconds)

Odisha State Road Transportation ... vs Lokanath Hota on 29 August, 2013

The matter was also elaborately discussed in Chief Workshop Manager (P), Carriage Repair Workshop, Mancheswar Railway Workshop, Bhubaneswar v. Sri Akshya Kumar Rout : 80 (1995) CLT 594. Legislative intent is to consider loss of earning capacity in case of permanent/partial disablement. The effect of any temporary engagement and/or temporary job may practically result in no reduction in emolument. That does not have any determinative effect. Plea of the Board and its functionaries is without any merit."
Orissa High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Depot Manager,Apsrtc,Karimnagar ... vs D.Ramulu on 22 July, 2022

12. Though the 1st respondent/applicant engaged counsel, there is no representation. In the circumstances, this Court appointed Sri K. Sanga Reddy, Advocate, as amicus curiae to assist the Court in the matter. He is before this Court and placed reliance on the decision of High Court of Orissa in Chief Workshop Manager (P.), Carriage Repair Workshop, Bhubaneshwar Vs. Akshaya Kumar Rout1 wherein it was held as follows:
Telangana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - M Laxman - Full Document

Orissa State Electricity Board And Ors. vs Kedar Charan Lenka on 16 August, 1996

The matter was also elaborately discussed in Chief Workshop Manager (P), Carriage Repair Workshop, Mancheswar Railway Workshop, Bhubaneswar v. Sri Akshaya Kumar Rout, 1995 80CLT 594. Legislative intent is to consider loss of earning capacity in cases of permanent partial disablement. The effect of any temporary engagement and or temporary job may practically result in no reduction in emoluments . That does not have any determinative effect. Plea of the Board and its Functionaries is without any merit.
Orissa High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 4 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Prasanta Kumar Majhi vs Managing Director, Orissa Mining ... on 2 March, 2001

"In considering loss of earning capacity in case of 'permanent partial disablement' the comparison between the wages drawn by the workman before and after the accident, from his employer at the time of the accident is not a determinative factor. If that be so, a cunning employer to tide over liability may offer a temporary employment in the claimant workman to deprive the latter his entitlements under the Act. That would be against the legislative intent. This Court also had occasion to deal with an almost similar case where a plea of existing job allotment and non-reduction in wages was involved. The employer-appellant was the employer in that case.
Orissa High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 2 - P Ray - Full Document
1