Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 294 (1.32 seconds)
Documents citing Vinod Khanna And Ors. vs Bakshi Sachdev on 20 April, 1995

Dharamvir Singh vs Knewton Academy Softech Solution Pvt ... on 11 December, 2025

"31. We find that this Court has in several cases taken judicial notice of the factum of increase of rent and made awards of mesne profits and damages. Noteworthy in this behalf is a judicial pronouncement of the Division Bench reported at (supra) entitled Vinod Kumar v. Bakshi Sachdev. This judgment was delivered by a Division Bench of which one of us (Dr. M.K. Sharma, J.) had delivered the judgment. It was held as under: "21. The learned Counsel for the appellants also urged before us that the learned Trial Court was not justified in taking a judicial notice of the fact of increase of rents like the suit property and also in providing Rs. 10,000/- per month as fair amount towards damages/mesne profits in favor of the plaintiff. It is true that no substantial evidence has been led by the plaintiff in respect of the CS (COMM) No. : 236/2023 19/34 increase of rent in the properties like that of the suit property. However, it is a well known fact that the amount of rent for various properties in and around Delhi has been rising staggeringly and we cannot see why such judicial notice could not be taken of the fact about such increase of rents in the premises in and around Delhi which is a city of growing importance being the capital of the country which is a matter of public history. At this stage we may appropriately refer to the Court making judicial notice of the increase of price of land rapidly in the urban areas in connection with the land acquisition matters.
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hamir Singh S/O Sh. Mehang Singh vs Ashok Kumar S/O Sh. Harbhajan Lal on 26 July, 2012

49.This is also the fair rate of mesne profits, having regard to the commercial usage of the property, its location and extent. Although the plaintiff has not produced any witness other than himself to support his claim, this can be inferred by taking judicial notice of the phenomenal rise in rents in Delhi. That the Court is competent to take judicial notice of the rise in rental values follows from the decision of Vinod Khanna v. Bakshi Sachdev AIR 1996 Delhi 32, wherein the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi noted:
Delhi District Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Cbi vs Narayan Diwakar Etc. (Radhey Kunj Cghs) ... on 27 November, 2014

48. Sh. S. K. Bhatnagar, adv. has drawn my attention towards para no.20 in Vinod Khanna Vs. Bakshi Sachdev "the basic law presumption of service of notice is permitted under the provision of Section 27 of the General Clauses Act and also under the provision of Section 114 of the Evidence Act. It is further held that once letter is delivered to the post office, sender has no control over it and that it can then be presumed to have been delivered to the addressee under Section 27 of General Clauses Act."
Delhi District Court Cites 88 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mr. Raaj Vachher vs Mr. Jagdish Madan on 10 January, 2014

60.This is also the fair rate of mesne profits, having regard to the size, location and extent of the suit property. Although the plaintiff has not produced any witness other than himself to support his claim, this can be inferred by taking judicial notice of the phenomenal rise in rents in Delhi. That the Court is competent to take judicial notice of the rise in rental values follows from the 27/35 Mr. Raaj Vachher Vs. Mr. Jagdish Madan Suit no.877/09 decision of Vinod Khanna v. Bakshi Sachdev AIR 1996 Delhi 32, wherein the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi noted:
Delhi District Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

National Radio And Electronic Co. Ltd. vs Motion Pictures Association on 31 May, 2005

31. We find that this Court has in several cases taken judicial notice of the factum of increase of rent and made awards of mesne profits and damages. Noteworthy in this behalf is a judicial pronouncement of the Division Bench reported at (supra) entitled Vinod Kumar v. Bakshi Sachdev. This judgment was delivered by a Division Bench of which one of us (Dr. M.K. Sharma, J.) had delivered the judgment. It was held as under:
Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 136 - G Mittal - Full Document

Sh. Meer Singh @ Meeru vs Sh. Raj Kumar on 24 December, 2011

This fact, coupled with the general rise in rental rates in Delhi, can be taken judicial notice of. Reference may be made to the case of Bakshi Sachdev (D) by L.Rs. v. Concord 1993 RLR 563 and Vinod Khanna v. Bakshi Sachdev AIR 1996 Delhi 32 wherein Hon'ble High Court of Delhi held that the damages and mesne profits can be granted at a higher rate than the agreed rate of rent after the expiry of the tenancy and after taking judicial notice of the phenomenal rise in rents in Delhi. At the same time, since there is adequate material to indicate the market rate of rent, mesne profits/damages need not be restricted to the agreed rate of rent, particularly when there is nothing to suggest that the contractual rate of rent was in sync with the market rate.
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next