citedby: 1423650

1 - 3 of 3 (0.35 seconds)

Documents citing Maganlal Shivlal vs Memon Daudbhai Mithabhai on 12 December, 1968

Tayab Abubakar Latif vs Jadhavji Mithabhai on 30 September, 1993

73. Mr. S.B. Vakil, learned Counsel for the petitioner has also relied on the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Maganlal Shivlal v. Memon Daudbhai Mithabhai (1969) X GLR 336. That was a case under Section 13(1)(h) of the Saurashtra Rent Control Act. Section 13(1)(h) of the Saurashtra Rent Control Act quoted in the said judgment reads as under:

Gujarat High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gulam Maiyuddin Fakir vs Haseenabibi Jamalji on 19 March, 2013

(1) In Maganlal Shivlal v. Memon Daudbhai Mithabhai reported in 1969 GLR page 336, Division Bench of this Court has in the context of the Saurashtra Rent Control Act, held and observed as under in para 8:

Gujarat High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - C L Soni - Full Document

Khimchand Parshottam vs Shah Bhupatray Nathalal And Ors. on 21 January, 1970

6. Mr. Parghi, learned Advocate appearing for the appellant-defendant, submitted that such demolition and reconstruction would not be included within the meaning of the word "renovation". This question has been concluded by the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in Maganlal Shivlal v. Memon Daudbhai Mithabhai, (1969) 10 Guj LR 336. It has been observed therein:

Gujarat High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Tayab Abubakar Latif vs Jadhavji Mithabhai on 30 September, 1993

Gulam Maiyuddin Fakir vs Haseenabibi Jamalji on 19 March, 2013

Khimchand Parshottam vs Shah Bhupatray Nathalal And Ors. on 21 January, 1970