Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 63 (1.14 seconds)
Documents citing Pappu vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 July, 2006

Mhanta Dhar vs State on 27 August, 2019

In Pappu vs State of MP, (2006) 7 SCC 391, the Supreme Court almost exhaustively dealt with the parameters of Exception 4 to section 300 and held that the same can be invoked if death is caused 1. without premeditation; 2. in a sudden fight; 3. without the offender having taken undue advantage or acting in a cruel or unusual manner; and 4. the fight must have been with the person killed. It was remarked, "It cannot be laid down as a rule of universal application that whenever one blow is given, section 302 IPC is ruled out. It would depend upon the weapon used, the size of it in some cases, force with which the blow was given, part of the body on which it was given and several such relevant factors."
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ram Charan And Others vs State Of U.P. on 23 April, 2020

In Pappu vs State of MP, (2006) 7 SCC 391, the Supreme Court exhaustively dealt with the parameters of Exception 4 to section 300 and held that the same can be invoked if death is caused 1. without premeditation; 2. in a sudden fight; 3. without the offender having taken undue advantage or acting in a cruel or unusual manner; and 4. the fight must have been with the person killed. It was remarked, "It cannot be laid down as a rule of universal application that whenever one blow is given, section 302 ipc is ruled out. It would depend upon the weapon used, the size of it in some cases, force with which the blow was given, part of the body on which it was given and several such relevant factors."
Allahabad High Court Cites 123 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Yogesh @ Matru vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 8 August, 2022

In Pappu v. State of M.P. (2006) 7 SCC 391 the Hon‟ble Supreme Court of India dealt with an incident of fatal lathi blow during an altercation between the accused and the deceased for which the accused was convicted and sentenced alongwith other co-accused under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. The argument for the accused appellant before the Hon‟ble Supreme Court was that the assault happened in the course of a sudden quarrel, there was no pre-meditation and the accused had not taken advantage or acted in a cruel manner in giving the lathi blow. The issue, therefore, revolved around in applicability of Exception (4) of Section 300 IPC. In this regard the Hon‟ble Supreme Court held as follows:
Delhi High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - M Gupta - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next