The Special Officer vs The Presiding Officer on 25 January, 2021
operative Credit Society, represented by its Vice President, Vs. The
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Cuddalore and another [W.P.Nos.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.30 seconds)Documents citing
Town Municipal Council By Its Vice ... vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Hubli ... on 25 August, 1967
Inder Singh And Ors. vs Labour Court, Jullundur And Anr. on 3 October, 1968
In town Municipal Council, Athani v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Hubli, 1968-1 Lab LJ 779=(AIR 1968 Mys 150) it was held by a Division Bench of the Mysore high Court that claims of employees for wages for overtime work and for work on weekly off days amount to claims for many which they are entitled to receive from the employer, and fall within the ambit of Section 33C(2). Their Lordships further held that there was nothing in Section 33C(2) to exclude claims that can or could have been enforced under Section 20 of the Minimum Wages Act, and therefore, section 24 of the Minimum Wages Act does not bar a claim under Section 33C(2). Section 24 of the Minimum Wages Act, it was held, bars only the jurisdiction of Civil Courts to entertain suits in respect of such claims and does not even purport to bar the jurisdiction of the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) as a Labour Court cannot be considered to be a Court of general jurisdiction . It was held that even then there maybe overlapping of jurisdiction of the Labour Court where under the Minimum Wages Act each of the special tribunal s constituted under the two Acts has jurisdiction in respect of matters specified in the enactments constituting them.
1