Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (2.41 seconds)

K D Lite Developers Private ... vs Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tds ... on 27 November, 2024

The assessee has also relied upon the decision of the Coordinate Bench of ITAT in the case of Neo Sports Broadcast (P.) Ltd Vs. CIT (TDS), Mumbai, [2016] 69 27 ITA Nos. 5305, 5325, 5354, 5356 & 5357/MUM/2024 M/s. K D LITE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED taxmann.com 422 (Mumbai), wherein it was held that "Where a holding company provided bank guarantees for benefit of assessee, its reimbursement by assessee would not come under purview of interest so as to make assessee liable to TDS under Section 194A"
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shree Siddhivinayak Realhomes Private ... vs Ito, Tds Ward 2(2)(3), Mumbai, Mumbai on 9 December, 2024

The assessee has also relied upon the decision of the Coordinate Bench of ITAT in the case of Neo Sports Broadcast (P.) Ltd Vs. CIT (TDS), Mumbai, [2016] 69 taxmann.com 422 (Mumbai), wherein it was held that "Where a holding company provided bank guarantees for benefit of assessee, its reimbursement by assessee would not come under purview of interest so as to make assessee liable to TDS under Section 194A"
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shree Sukhakarta Developers Private ... vs Dcit, Osd Tds Circle 2(2), Mumbai, ... on 9 December, 2024

The assessee has also relied upon the decision of the Coordinate Bench of ITAT in the case of Neo Sports Broadcast (P.) Ltd Vs. CIT (TDS), Mumbai, [2016] 69 taxmann.com 422 (Mumbai), wherein it was held that "Where a holding company provided bank guarantees for benefit of assessee, its reimbursement by assessee would not come under purview of interest so as to make assessee liable to TDS under Section 194A"
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ruparel Developers (India) Private ... vs Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tds ... on 28 April, 2025

The assessee has also relied upon the decision of the Coordinate Bench of ITAT in the case of Neo Sports Broadcast (P.) Ltd Vs. CIT (TDS), Mumbai, [2016] 69 taxmann.com 422 (Mumbai), wherein it was held that "Where a holding company provided bank guarantees for benefit of assessee, its reimbursement by assessee would not come under purview of interest so as to make assessee liable to TDS under Section 194A"
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1