Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.23 seconds)

Union Territory Of Chandigarh And ... vs Central Administrative Tribunal on 12 October, 2010

The aforesaid order was upheld in the case of Sher Singh (supra). In para 6 the Division Bench has placed reliance on various judgements of Hon'ble the Supreme Court and other High Courts. Therefore, quashing of order of termination dated 22.11.2006 (P-4) does not necessarily debar petitioner from passing a fresh order in accordance with law.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 11 - R Bahri - Full Document

Tara Khanal vs Ut Of Chandigarh & Ors on 10 November, 2017

4 of 6 ::: Downloaded on - 09-12-2017 03:56:54 ::: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.14230 of 2013 (O&M) -5- for mis-conduct. The Division Bench quashed the order. Thereafter fresh orders simpliciter were passed reverting them to their substantive post with the observation that their services were no longer required in the higher post. The aforesaid order was upheld in the case of Sher Singh (supra). In para 6 the Division Bench has placed reliance on various judgements of Hon'ble the Supreme Court and other High Courts. Therefore, quashing of order of termination dated 22.11.2006 (P-4) does not necessarily debar petitioner from passing a fresh order in accordance with law.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 2 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document
1