Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18663 (5.35 seconds)
Documents citing Sanjay Chandra vs Cbi on 23 November, 2011

Maninder Sharma vs State Tax Officer on 31 August, 2022

In Sanjay Chandra's case (supra), the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that it is not in the interest of justice that accused should be in jail for an indefinite period. No doubt, the offence alleged against the accused is a serious one in terms of alleged huge loss to the State exchequer, that, by itself, should not deter the Court from enlarging the accused on bail when there is no serious contention of the State that the accused, if released on bail, would interfere with the trial or tamper with evidence.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 74 - Cited by 1 - J S Bedi - Full Document

Dr Shivinder Mohan Singh vs Directorate Of Enforcement on 23 July, 2020

How does one carry forward the Supreme Court precept that punishment _______________________________________________________________________ BAIL APPL. No. 1353/2020 Page 40 of 45 begins after conviction, and that every man is deemed to be innocent until duly tried and duly found guilty, if we deny bail without cogent reason (cf. Sanjay Chandra vs. CBI, supra).
Delhi High Court Cites 55 - Cited by 10 - A J Bhambani - Full Document

Sanjay Raghunathprashad Gupta vs State Of Gujarat on 5 April, 2016

20. It is true that the applicant is facing charges under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code for which sentence of imprisonment of life is prescribed. However, if the applicant was not facing the charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act (which is again challenged by way of separate petition and pending before this Court), the case could have proceeded before the learned Magistrate. In my opinion, it is not a heinous crime wherein there is an apprehension that he may tamper with the Page 13 of 18 HC-NIC Page 13 of 18 Created On Wed Apr 06 03:05:19 IST 2016 R/CR.MA/4146/2016 ORDER prosecution witnesses or is danger to the Society at large. The case is based on documentary evidences which is required to be proved by the prosecution at the time of trial. Several paragraphs quoted in the decision in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation (Supra) are not reproduced since the same are quoted from the judgment referred herein above. However, in the background of aforesaid facts, relevant paragraph Nos.41, 42, 43 and 44 of the said decision are reproduced herein below :-
Gujarat High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 3 - A J Desai - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next