Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.23 seconds)

The State vs C.P. Singh And Ors. on 19 August, 1954

14. Reliance was placed upon a decision of a single Judge of this Court in the case of -- 'State v. Surajdeo Sinha', AIR 1954 Pat 80 (A). The provisions of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952, came to be considered in that case in the following circumstances. In the course of commitment enquiry before a Magistrate, an application was filed on 25-7-1952, for the examination of one Mr. Mahadevan on commission on the ground of his serious illness. This application was allowed on 31-7-1952, and Mr. Mahadevan was examined on three dates in August, 1952. Now, the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952, received the assent of the President of India on 28-7-1952, and was published in the Bihar Gazette of 7-8-1952. In pursuance of the provisions of Section 6 of that Act, the State Government made the appointment of Special Judges on 28-8-1952, and, on 9-9-1952, the proceedings which were pending before the Magistrate were transferred to the Special Judge appointed under the Criminal Law Amendment Act.
Patna High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ram Bachan Singh vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 24 September, 2010

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits with reference to Annexure-1 that opposite party nos. 2 and 3 namely Umesh Singh and Pashupati Singh were earlier tried and convicted for an offence punishable under Section 147 and 323 by judgment and order dated 31.5.1988 passed in Tr. No. 752/1988 (State versus Surajdeo Singh & Ors). It is contended that wrong submission was made on behalf of the convicts/opposite parties that the accuseds did not carry any criminal antecedent and/or convicted on any occasion in the past.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - K K Mandal - Full Document

Ram Bachan Singh vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 24 September, 2010

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits with reference to Annexure-1 that opposite party nos. 2 and 3 namely Umesh Singh and Pashupati Singh were earlier tried and convicted for an offence punishable under Section 147 and 323 by judgment and order dated 31.5.1988 passed in Tr. No. 752/1988 (State versus Surajdeo Singh & Ors). It is contended that wrong submission was made on behalf of the convicts/opposite parties that the accuseds did not carry any criminal antecedent and/or convicted on any occasion in the past.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - K K Mandal - Full Document
1