Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.27 seconds)

Ashrafi Singh vs Bidyaprasad Narain Singh on 22 April, 1913

In Lokenath Shah Chowdhry v. Nedu Biswas (1902) I.L.R. 29 Calc. 382, the High Court refused to interfere with the management by the Magistrate of property attached under Section 146, on the ground that the intervention of the Magistrate was only temporary, and a remedy could be obtained in the Civil Court. The point before us was not before the Court, and we do not lay too much stress on observations in the judgment not directed to that point. It is clear, however, that the remedy which the Judges contemplated was a remedy by way of final decision of the respective rights of the parties. "It is beyond doubt" they say, "that recourse must be had to the Civil Court for a final settlement of the matter in dispute, pending which the Magistrate by an attachment holds the land".
Calcutta High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1