Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.45 seconds)
Documents citing Greaves Fesesco Ltd. vs Ratlam Ispat Ltd. (In Liquidation) on 15 July, 1993

Kamani Exployees Union vs The Official Liquidator Of Kma Ltd And 3 ... on 8 August, 2019

In order to lend support to this submission, a strong reliance was placed on the judgments of the Supreme Court in the case of NGEF Ltd. VS. Chandra Developers (P) Limited & Anr. 1, of the Delhi High Court in the case of Greaves Fresco Ltd. Vs. Ratlam Ispat Ltd. (In Liquidation) 2 , and of the Gujarat High Court in the case of Indoco Remedies Limited Vs. Official Liquidator of Kay Packaging Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.3.
Bombay High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - N J Jamadar - Full Document

Mrs. Triveni A. Kulkarni vs Official Liquidator And 7 Ors on 8 August, 2019

In order to lend support to this submission, a strong reliance was placed on the judgments of the Supreme Court in the case of NGEF Ltd. VS. Chandra Developers (P) Limited & Anr. 1, of the Delhi High Court in the case of Greaves Fresco Ltd. Vs. Ratlam Ispat Ltd. (In Liquidation) 2 , and of the Gujarat High Court in the case of Indoco Remedies Limited Vs. Official Liquidator of Kay Packaging Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.3.
Bombay High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - N J Jamadar - Full Document

Medisphere Marketing P. Ltd. vs Medi Trade Medical Trading on 28 January, 2008

13. Reference may also be made to the decision of a learned Single Judge of this Court in Greaves Fesesco Ltd. v. Ratlam Ispat Ltd. reported in (1997) 88 Company Cases 155 (Delhi), wherein the effect of the provisions of Sub-section (2) of Section 441 of the Companies Act was considered in juxtaposition with the provisions of Sections 446, 447 and 537 of the Companies Act. In terms of the provisions of the Companies Act, a winding up petition is required to be filed within the period of limitation, as prescribed. Section 441 of the Companies Act deals with the provisions with regard to commencement of winding up proceedings. Sub-section (2) of Section 441 states that the winding up of a company will be deemed to commence at the time of the presentation of the winding up petition. The said provision reads as follows:
Delhi High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 1 - M Sharma - Full Document

Re-Shahi Fashions Pvt Ltd vs Unknown on 8 February, 2019

6. The learned counsel for the OL however relies upon the judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Balvinder Kaur Rao v. M/s Grow Green Forest (India) Ltd. & Ors.; judgments of this court in the case of Ram Janam Sharma v. JVG Finance Ltd., (2011) IIIAD (Delhi) 280 and Greaves Fesesco Ltd. v. Ratlam Ispat Ltd. (1997) 88 Co.Cases 155 (Delhi); and judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Bhavnagar University v. Palitana Sugar Mill Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. AIR 2003 SC 511 to contend that provisions of section 537(1)(b) is mandatory and the sale which is the subject matter of the present application is liable to be declared as null and void.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - J Nath - Full Document
1