Muruvan And Ors. vs Ramabadra Naidu on 3 January, 1957
In Barthol Duming Rodriks v. Papa Dada 22 Cri LI 624 : AIR 1922 Bom 191 (B), it was held that a person who is directed to pay compensation under Section 22 of the Cattle Trespass Act can be said to be convicted of an offence, but the compensation awarded against him, though recoverable as a fine, is not a ''fine'' within the meaning of the Penal Code, and therefore, an appeal against his conviction lies under Section 408 of the Criminal Procedure Code and does not fall within the restrictive provisions of Section 413 of that Code.