Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 288 (0.04 seconds)
Documents citing Sonu @ Subhash Kumar vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 1 March, 2021

R.Sibiraj vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 18 July, 2023

In the case of Pramod Suryabhan Pawar Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. reported in (2019) 9 SCC 608 as well as in the case of Sonu alias Subhash Kumar Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. reported in AIR 2021 SCC 1405, the Hon'ble Supreme Court quashed the FIR registered against the appellant therein for the reason that there is no allegation in the FIR to the effect that the promise done by the appellant to marry the complainant was false, but, in the present case, the second respondent/de-facto complainant both in her complaint as well as statement has clearly stated that the petitioner/accused promised her that he would marry her and based on such promise, he had sexual relationship with her. 10/20 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Madras High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - V Sivagnanam - Full Document

Jiyaullah vs State Of U.P. And Another on 15 September, 2023

17. Thus, from the cumulative reading of the judgments passed by the Apex Court in Shivashankar (supra), Pramod Suryabhan Pawar (Supra), Sonu alias Subhash Kumar (supra), Dr. Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar (supra) and Mango Ram (supra), it is apparent that when there is a longstanding relationship between the parties under the promise of marriage. It is to be seen that whether such promise of marriage was false at the inception or it is a subsequent breakdown of relationship and refusal to marry amounts to breach of such promise, which was genuinely made at the inception of such relationship.
Allahabad High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Thiyagarajan S/O. Velu … vs W25 on 24 September, 2024

"10. Bearing in mind the tests which have been enunciated in the above decision, we are of the view that even assuming that all the allegations in the FIR are correct for the purposes of considering the application for quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C., no offence has been established. There is no allegation to the effect that the promise to marry given to the second respondent was false at the inception. On the contrary, it would appear from the contents of the FIR that there was a subsequent refusal on the part of the appellant to marry the second respondent which gave rise to the registration of the FIR. On these facts, we are of the view that the High Court was in error in declining to entertain the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on the basis that it was only the evidence at trial which would lead to a determination as to whether an offence was established".
Madras High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Tapash Kumar Ray@ Rupam vs The State Of Assam on 23 February, 2023

In Sonu alias Subhash Kumar (supra), it was further held that:-" there is no allegation to the effect that the promise to marry given to the second respondent was false at the inception. On the contrary, it would appear from the contents of the FIR that there was a subsequent refusal on the part of the appellant to marry the second respondent which gave rise to the registration of the FIR. On these facts, we are of the view that the High Court was in error in declining to entertain the petition under Section 482 of CrPC on the basis that it was only the evidence at trial which would lead to a determination as to whether an offence was established."
Gauhati High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepak Singh Patel vs State Of U.P. And Another on 27 October, 2025

No.7004 of 2025] and Sonu alias Subhash Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh and another AIR 2021 Supreme Court 1405, the further proceedings of Criminal Case No.1310 of 2024 (State Vs. Deepak Singh Patel), arising out of Case Crime No. 0044 of 2024, under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 of I.P.C., Police Station Phaphamau District Ganga Nagar (Commissionerate Prayagraj, pending before the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.6, Allahabad, shall remain stayed, qua the applicant till the next date fixed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Saddam Husain vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 24 April, 2024

12. Per contra, the learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail. He contends that since applicant is a named and charge sheeted accused, therefore, he does not deserve any indulgence by this Court. The prosecutrix is a young girl aged about 19 years whose modesty has been repeatedly and continuously dislodged by the applicant for the last two years. The applicant developed affinity with the prosecutrix by extending a promise of marriage from which, he has subsequently resiled inasmuch as, the applicant has failed to perform marriage with the prosecutrix up to this stage. The prosecutrix is a young girl aged about 20 years, whose life has been put into peril. Reference has also been made to the following judgments of the Supreme Court in (i). Sonu alias Subhash Kumar Vs. State of U.P., 2021 SCC OnLine SC 181, (ii).
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - R Misra - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next