Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.42 seconds)
Documents citing Shri Hazi Arif vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 13 May, 2022

Sudhir D Pawar vs State Of Maharashtra on 5 July, 2024

2. We find that issue of covering a storm water drain by putting RCC slab has been considered by Tribunal in O.A No. 16/2014, Shri Hazi Ariff v. State of U.P & Ors., wherein it has been observed that putting such a 1 slab is not in conformity with environmental laws and such slab if has already been put in, should be demolished/removed. Relevant observation in judgement is reproduced as under:-
National Green Tribunal Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pramod Kumar Agarwal vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 12 December, 2022

11. That, the representatives of Municipal Corporation informed that complainant's demand of covering the drain cannot be fulfilled as it would lead to issues in cleaning and regular maintenance of the drain. Further, Hon'ble Tribunal in its various orders has adjudicated against covering of drains. The issue of covering of Sahibabad Drain-1 is also pending before the Hon'ble Tribunal in Original Application 16/2014, Hazi Arif versus State of U.P. and others. In the said matter as well, Municipal Corporation has maintained that no permission has been given to any private party on the said drain since 2012. Same is also incorporated in Functional Plan on Drainage for National Capital Region, approved in the 65th meeting of the Planning Committee of NCR Planning Board.
National Green Tribunal Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Pramod Kumar Agarwal vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 18 July, 2023

11. That, the representatives of Municipal Corporation informed that complainant's demand of covering the drain cannot be fulfilled as it would lead to issues in cleaning and regular maintenance of the drain. Further, Hon'ble Tribunal in its various orders has adjudicated against covering of drains. The issue of covering of Sahibabad Drain- 1 is also pending before the Hon'ble Tribunal in Original Application 16/2014, Hazi Arif versus State of U.P. and others. In the said matter as well, Municipal Corporation has maintained that no permission has been given to any private party on the said drain since 2012. Same is also incorporated in Functional Plan on Drainage for National Capital Region, approved in the 65th meeting of the Planning Committee of NCR Planning Board.
National Green Tribunal Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pramod Kumar Agarwal vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 27 November, 2024

11. That, the representatives of Municipal Corporation informed that complainant's demand of covering the drain cannot be fulfilled as it would lead to issues in cleaning and regular maintenance of the drain. Further, Hon'ble Tribunal in its various orders has adjudicated against covering of drains. The issue of covering of Sahibabad Drain-1 is also pending before the Hon'ble Tribunal in Original Application 16/2014, Hazi Arif versus State of U.P. and others. In the said matter as well, Municipal Corporation has maintained that no permission has been given to any private party on the said drain since 2012. Same is also incorporated in Functional Plan on Drainage for National Capital Region, approved in the 65th meeting of the Planning Committee of NCR Planning Board.
National Green Tribunal Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sushil Raghav vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 26 September, 2022

2. The Applicant has referred to order of this Tribunal dated 13.05.2022 in O.A No. 16/2014, Shri Hazi Ariff v. State of U.P & Ors., directing that buffer zone of the drain has to be free from constructions. It was further observer that viable alternatives such as sewer line ensuring free flow of storm water drain without pollution could to be explored as alternative to demolition of already raised constructions. Operative part of the order is reproduced below:-
National Green Tribunal Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Goel - Full Document

Pankaj Prasad vs Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board on 24 February, 2026

3. Learned Counsel for the Applicant has submitted that the Tribunal by the order dated 12.12.2025 had directed the Respondent No. 3 to ensure that the Respondent No. 6 did not cover the stream/drain in question in violation of the order of the Tribunal in the case of Shri Hazi Arif vs. State of UP and Ors. He submits that the above order of the Tribunal has been violated by the Respondents No. 3 and 6.
National Green Tribunal Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1