Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 836 (0.07 seconds)
Documents citing Sanjeev Kumar vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 22 January, 1999

Siligireddy Janardhan Reddy vs State Of Telangana on 7 June, 2022

In Sanjeev Kumar Vs. State of H.P., the Hon'ble Apex Court had an occasion to examine scope and ambit of Section 212 of IPC and the ingredients of the said offence. It held that to attract the provision of Section 212 of IPC, it is necessary to establish the commission of offence, harbouring or concealing a person whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the offender and such concealing must be with an intention of screening him from the legal punishment. As stated above, there are specific allegations against the petitioner herein. He has suggested A-1 to hide himself, and police have arrested some of the accused from the house of the petitioner herein. He knows about the disputes between A-1 and the deceased including the business disputes. Thus, prima facie, the contents of the charge sheet constitute said offence and ingredients of Section 212 of IPC are there in the charge sheet. It is relevant to note that in the said case accused was convicted, and in the present case the matter is at trial stage. The petitioner herein has to face the trial and prove his innocence. The defence taken by him cannot be considered in a petition filed under Section 482 of Code of 10 Crl. P. No.9798 of 2021 Criminal Procedure. Therefore, the said principle is not applicable to the present case.
Telangana High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - K L Goud - Full Document

The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Sureshchandra And Anr. on 7 November, 2022

10] In the considered opinion of this Court the aforesaid finding is perverse and cannot be sustained. So far as the decision relied upon by the counsel for the appellant in the case of Sanjeev Kumar Vs State of H.P. and Premji Bhai Bechubhai Khasiya Vs State of Gujarat are concerned, the same are distinguishable and are also not binding on this Court. In such facts and circumstances of the case, when the conviction is solely based on the DNA report of the accused persons, this Court finds that the DNA report is negative so far as the appellant Ajay is concerned, however, the same clearly connect the appellant Suresh beyond reasonable doubt. Appellant Suresh has also not been able to rebut the aforesaid presumption and to explain the presence of his DNA on the petticoat of the deceased.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

______________________________________________________________________ vs State Of H.P. And Another on 12 December, 2019

3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of with the direction that O.A. No. 802/2016, titled as 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? ::: Downloaded on - 13/12/2019 20:41:02 :::HCHP 2 Sanjeev Kumar Vs. State of H.P. and others, be transferred expeditiously .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A M Goel - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next