C I T vs Ram Singh on 21 January, 2014
42. We have noticed following observations of the Karnataka High Court in CIT Vs. Gauthamchand Bhandari reported in (2012) 347 ITR 491,499:-
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (3.55 seconds)C I T vs Rajaram Jaidev on 31 January, 2014
This Court has also considered the findings recorded by the Karnataka High Court in CIT Vs. Gauthamchand Bhandari reported in (2012) 347 ITR 491.
C I T vs Bablir Singh Mahipat on 4 January, 2017
We have noticed following observations of the
Karnataka High Court in CIT Vs. Gauthamchand
Bhandari reported in (2012) 347 ITR 491,499:-
C I T Jaipur vs Krishan Lal Meel & Party on 12 April, 2017
41. We have noticed following observations of the Karnataka
High Court in CIT v. Gauthamchand Bhandari reported in
MANU/KA/1788/2010 : (2012) 347 ITR 491, 499:--
C I T Jaipur vs Krishan Lal Meel & Party on 12 April, 2017
41. We have noticed following observations of the Karnataka
High Court in CIT v. Gauthamchand Bhandari reported in
MANU/KA/1788/2010 : (2012) 347 ITR 491, 499:--
C I T vs M/S Banna Lai Girdhari Singh And on 31 July, 2018
2001 EWCA Civ 405, wherein the Court referred to
Article 6 of European Convention of Human Rights
which requires, "adequate and intelligent reasons
must be given for judicial decisions".
o. In all common law jurisdictions judgments play
a vital role in setting up precedents for the future.
Therefore, for development of law, requirement of
giving reasons for the decision is of the essence
and is virtually a part of "Due Process".
We have noticed following observations of the
Karnataka High Court in CIT v. Gauthamchand
Bhandari reported in MANU/KA/1788/2010 :
1