Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 44 (5.41 seconds)
Documents citing Tumati Rangayya Etc. vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh And Ors. on 13 October, 1977

Purshottam Dass Tandon And Ors. vs State Of U.P. Lucknow And Ors. on 25 March, 1986

Once exercised it is complete, and results in total deprivation of the State's power to legislate upon 'a law made by Parliament' pursuant to the power surrendered to it by the legislature of two or more States holds a very special position under the Constitution and must be held to prevail over any other State law (T. Rangayya v. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1978 Andh Pra 106 (FB).
Allahabad High Court Cites 55 - Cited by 26 - R M Sahai - Full Document

Birajananda Das Gupta (Deceased By Lrs) vs Competent Authority Under The Urban ... on 16 July, 1987

8. It has been held by Chinnappa Reddy, J., (as his Lordship then was in the Andhra Pradesh High Court) speaking for a five-Judge Full Bench in Tumati Rangayya v. State of Andhra Pradesh, , that the expression "any Act so passed shall apply to such States" in Article 252(1), "is peremptory enough to suggest that the Act so passed shall prevail over any State Law" and that "the position is further clarified by the second clause of Article 252 which bars the amendment or repeal of the Act by any Act of a State Legislature".
Calcutta High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

M.A. Sultan Mohiuddin And Etc. vs Govt. Of A.P. And Ors. on 16 November, 2001

8. Similar resolutions were passed by the Legislatures of the other States such as Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh , Karnataka etc. In pursuance of these resolutions, the Parliament enacted the Ceiling Act being Act 33 of 1976. The Act became applicable in those States, the Legislatures of which passed resolutions anterior to the enactment of the Ceiling Act. States, such as, Madhya Pradesh, adopted the same subsequently. The validity of the Ceiling Act visa-vis the respective powers of the Parliament and State Legislations, which became the subject-matters of the cases before the Hon'ble Supreme Court such as Bheem Singhji v. Union of India, ; T. Venkaiah v. State of A. P.. and a larger Bench of five Judges of this Court in T. Rangayya v. State of A. P., to mention a few, had been upheld.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - B Nazki - Full Document

Varanasi Lakshmi vs State Bank Of India, Rep. By Its Branch ... on 6 February, 2007

In other words, if Order 21, Rule 90, Civil Procedure Code, as amended by the Parliamentary Enactment is taken to be exhaustive on the topic having been made, it must be held that the Parliament did not intend that there should be any law on the same topic by any other organ of the State. Obviously, the test cannot apply to the facts of the present case because the underlying postulate of Section 97 of Act CIV of 1976 is that there can be a law in addition to the Parliamentary law provided the former is consistent with the Parliament. The second test which is applied is whether the previous law would after, impair or detract from the operation of a later Parliamentary law. This is the test which the great Judge Dixon, J., compounded in Victoria v. Commonwealth of Australia (58 CLR 618) and accepted by our Court in its Full Bench judgment reported in Rangayya v. State MR 1978 A.P. 106 (F.B.). Dixon J, explained the meaning of ''inconsistency' in the above mentioned Australian case, in the following words:
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dr.K.Manmohan Reddy vs The State Of A.P. Rep. By Prl. Secretary ... on 6 October, 2025

Bandi Krishnamurthy vs. Pasupuleti Venkatesam 87; Nallari Rangai Seshagiri Rao vs. Mallani Achaiah 88; T.R.Thandur vs. Union of India and others 89; Tumati Rangayya vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and others 90; Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh and others vs. L.V.A. Dixitulu and others 91; Poonam Bai and others vs. A. Jameer Bhikku 92; Byram Pestonji Gariwala vs. Union of India and others 93; Nalla Yakoob S/o. Bala Gattaiah vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh; Revenue (UC.II) Department rep. by its Secretary Secretariat and others 94; S.P.Chengalvaraya Naidu vs Jagannath 95; Gowrishankar and another vs. Joshi Amba Shankar Family Trust and others 96; S. 87 1961 AWR 413 88 CRP No.2034 of 1963 dated 22.06.1996 89 (1996) 3 SCC 690 90 AIR 1978 AP 106 91 (1979) 2 SCC 34 92 1987 SCC Online AP 343 93 AIR 1991 SC 2234 94 1992 SCC Online AP 102 95 AIR 1994 SC 853 96 AIR 1996 SC 2202
Telangana High Court Cites 149 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manikonda Yadaiah And Another vs N.S. Chakravarthy And 17 Others on 6 October, 2025

Bandi Krishnamurthy vs. Pasupuleti Venkatesam 87; Nallari Rangai Seshagiri Rao vs. Mallani Achaiah 88; T.R.Thandur vs. Union of India and others 89; Tumati Rangayya vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and others 90; Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh and others vs. L.V.A. Dixitulu and others 91; Poonam Bai and others vs. A. Jameer Bhikku 92; Byram Pestonji Gariwala vs. Union of India and others 93; Nalla Yakoob S/o. Bala Gattaiah vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh; Revenue (UC.II) Department rep. by its Secretary Secretariat and others 94; S.P.Chengalvaraya Naidu vs Jagannath 95; Gowrishankar and another vs. Joshi Amba Shankar Family Trust and others 96; S. 87 1961 AWR 413 88 CRP No.2034 of 1963 dated 22.06.1996 89 (1996) 3 SCC 690 90 AIR 1978 AP 106 91 (1979) 2 SCC 34 92 1987 SCC Online AP 343 93 AIR 1991 SC 2234 94 1992 SCC Online AP 102 95 AIR 1994 SC 853 96 AIR 1996 SC 2202
Telangana High Court Cites 149 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K. Sudhir Kumar vs The State Of Telangana on 6 October, 2025

Bandi Krishnamurthy vs. Pasupuleti Venkatesam 87; Nallari Rangai Seshagiri Rao vs. Mallani Achaiah 88; T.R.Thandur vs. Union of India and others 89; Tumati Rangayya vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and others 90; Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh and others vs. L.V.A. Dixitulu and others 91; Poonam Bai and others vs. A. Jameer Bhikku 92; Byram Pestonji Gariwala vs. Union of India and others 93; Nalla Yakoob S/o. Bala Gattaiah vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh; Revenue (UC.II) Department rep. by its Secretary Secretariat and others 94; S.P.Chengalvaraya Naidu vs Jagannath 95; Gowrishankar and another vs. Joshi Amba Shankar Family Trust and others 96; S. 87 1961 AWR 413 88 CRP No.2034 of 1963 dated 22.06.1996 89 (1996) 3 SCC 690 90 AIR 1978 AP 106 91 (1979) 2 SCC 34 92 1987 SCC Online AP 343 93 AIR 1991 SC 2234 94 1992 SCC Online AP 102 95 AIR 1994 SC 853 96 AIR 1996 SC 2202
Telangana High Court Cites 149 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manikonda Yadaiah And Another vs Srinivas Katta And 204 Others on 6 October, 2025

Bandi Krishnamurthy vs. Pasupuleti Venkatesam 87; Nallari Rangai Seshagiri Rao vs. Mallani Achaiah 88; T.R.Thandur vs. Union of India and others 89; Tumati Rangayya vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and others 90; Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh and others vs. L.V.A. Dixitulu and others 91; Poonam Bai and others vs. A. Jameer Bhikku 92; Byram Pestonji Gariwala vs. Union of India and others 93; Nalla Yakoob S/o. Bala Gattaiah vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh; Revenue (UC.II) Department rep. by its Secretary Secretariat and others 94; S.P.Chengalvaraya Naidu vs Jagannath 95; Gowrishankar and another vs. Joshi Amba Shankar Family Trust and others 96; S. 87 1961 AWR 413 88 CRP No.2034 of 1963 dated 22.06.1996 89 (1996) 3 SCC 690 90 AIR 1978 AP 106 91 (1979) 2 SCC 34 92 1987 SCC Online AP 343 93 AIR 1991 SC 2234 94 1992 SCC Online AP 102 95 AIR 1994 SC 853 96 AIR 1996 SC 2202
Telangana High Court Cites 149 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

G Balaiah, R.R.Dist And 3 Others vs K Manmohan Reddy, Hyderabad And 32 ... on 6 October, 2025

Bandi Krishnamurthy vs. Pasupuleti Venkatesam 87; Nallari Rangai Seshagiri Rao vs. Mallani Achaiah 88; T.R.Thandur vs. Union of India and others 89; Tumati Rangayya vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and others 90; Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh and others vs. L.V.A. Dixitulu and others 91; Poonam Bai and others vs. A. Jameer Bhikku 92; Byram Pestonji Gariwala vs. Union of India and others 93; Nalla Yakoob S/o. Bala Gattaiah vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh; Revenue (UC.II) Department rep. by its Secretary Secretariat and others 94; S.P.Chengalvaraya Naidu vs Jagannath 95; Gowrishankar and another vs. Joshi Amba Shankar Family Trust and others 96; S. 87 1961 AWR 413 88 CRP No.2034 of 1963 dated 22.06.1996 89 (1996) 3 SCC 690 90 AIR 1978 AP 106 91 (1979) 2 SCC 34 92 1987 SCC Online AP 343 93 AIR 1991 SC 2234 94 1992 SCC Online AP 102 95 AIR 1994 SC 853 96 AIR 1996 SC 2202
Telangana High Court Cites 149 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next