Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.25 seconds)

V. Velumurugan vs Smt. Kavitha L on 6 August, 2024

In this regard, learned counsel for the owner of the vehicle relies upon the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in VIJAYAKUMARI R. Vs. KALPANA reported in 2018 ACJ 1462. At para 12 of the said judgment, this Court discussed in detail with reference to the Section 14(2) of the M.V.Act, where a special driving licence is mandated in order to drive a tanker. The vehicle involved in this case is a tanker wherein the abrasions are noted as non-owning of medical fitness certificate, age proof of the driver and minor breaches in the licensing conditions. These are the minor abrasions, which can be ignored as they are inconsequential deviations. But herein this case, -9- NC: 2024:KHC:31229 MFA No. 5973 of 2013 C/W MFA.CROB No. 80 of 2021 the driver of the vehicle did not have valid endorsement authorizing him to drive the special category of vehicle which carrying a hazardous goods (controlled goods petrol). Petrol is an highly inflammable material which fall within the purview of the hazardous goods. Hence, the judgment of this Court is not going to help the owner of the vehicle to force the insurance company to shoulder his responsibility.
Karnataka High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Kavitha L vs The Manager, New India Assurance Co Ltd on 6 August, 2024

In this regard, learned counsel for the owner of the vehicle relies upon the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in VIJAYAKUMARI R. Vs. KALPANA reported in 2018 ACJ 1462. At para 12 of the said judgment, this Court discussed in detail with reference to the Section 14(2) of the M.V.Act, where a special driving licence is mandated in order to drive a tanker. The vehicle involved in this case is a tanker wherein the abrasions are noted as non-owning of medical fitness certificate, age proof of the driver and minor breaches in the licensing conditions. These are the minor abrasions, which can be ignored as they are inconsequential deviations. But herein this case, -9- NC: 2024:KHC:31229 MFA No. 5973 of 2013 C/W MFA.CROB No. 80 of 2021 the driver of the vehicle did not have valid endorsement authorizing him to drive the special category of vehicle which carrying a hazardous goods (controlled goods petrol). Petrol is an highly inflammable material which fall within the purview of the hazardous goods. Hence, the judgment of this Court is not going to help the owner of the vehicle to force the insurance company to shoulder his responsibility.
Karnataka High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1