Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.18 seconds)
Documents citing Gurmukh Singh Nagi vs Sheo Karan And Ors. on 13 September, 1995

Munawar Ulla vs New India Assurance Co. Ltd. And Ors. on 10 January, 2005

5. Learned counsel for appellant placed reliance on Gurmukh Singh Nagi v. Sheo Karan , wherein Punjab and Haryana High Court has taken a view that if a taxi driver accommodates more passengers than the capacity of taxi, the claimants will not be disallowed from claiming compensation for the injuries suffered by them or the heirs of the deceased from claiming compensation for the death of the occupants sitting in the taxi.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - N K Mody - Full Document

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Narinder Kour And Ors. on 3 March, 1997

The welfare of the dependents of the victim of the accident is the basic postulate for the immunity of such an afterthought plea. Respondents 1 to 4 herein cannot be deprived of the benefits of the beneign provisions of the Act which have been amended or incorporated by way of curitive amendments effected in the Act and they are deemed to have retrospective effect. The factual plea on the basis of the terms of the policy is also not available to the appellant because respondents will be deprived of the right of rebuttal. Similar view was taken by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Gurmukh Singh Nagi v. Sheo Karan, 1996 Acc CJ 706, where the plea of Insurance Company regarding its limited liability as per statute did not find favour as no issue was framed. The insured would have proved his case in case of issue being framed as additional premium was paid by him.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1