Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.25 seconds)

Sri Arup Kumar Bose vs Sri Pralay Kumar Das on 20 March, 2015

The Appellant has also filed the completion certificate dated 24/12/09.  From the BNA of the Appellant it is clear that 3rd party interest has already been created.  In the petition of complaint at paragraph 10 the Complainants have also expressed apprehension about the creation of 3rd party interest.  It is the case of the OP/Appellant that the agreement has been cancelled as the Complainants did not make payment of the balance amount as per terms of the agreement and in this connection the Learned Counsel for the Appellant has referred to the decision reported in 2013 (1) CPR 65 (NC) (supra) wherein it has been held that the allotment of flat can be cancelled for default in payment.  Admittedly, out of Rs.13 lakh, Rs.9 lakh has been paid by the Complainants.  Since it appears from the BNA of the Appellant that 3rd party interest has been created and agreement has been cancelled, we are of the view that the Complainant is entitled to get refund of the amount already pad to the OP/Appellant and get compensation.  We, therefore, modify the impugned judgment as hereunder.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Superintending Engineer, Housefed & ... vs Anu Singla on 6 February, 2017

5.       It was contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that the reply filed by them should be ordered to be taken on record, because they could not file the same due to the pendency of the application under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.  The learned counsel has drawn attention to an order passed by this Commission on 07.01.2014 in Revision Petition No. 2386/2008, "Sh. D. Vilas Rao, Dy. Manager (Legal) vs. Sh. Amit Kumar Sharma", saying that they should have been given the opportunity to file written statement and lead evidence in their favour after the disposal of application under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1