Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.33 seconds)

M/S D. G. Oil Foods Pvt. Ltd. vs Indian Bank on 8 April, 2026

In one of the writ petitions, W.P. No.25138/2021 (M/s Divyadeep Sugar and Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. India Bank and Others), this Court vide order dated 23.11.2021 has Signature Not Verified Signed by: SHRUTI JHA Signing time: 08-04- 2026 18:04:02 NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:27326 2 WP-12124-2026 issued certain directions to be followed by the borrower as well as by the Bank/Financial Institutions. He further submits that in addition to the aforesaid directions, one more direction may kindly be issued because the bid has been finalized and now, the purchaser as well as the Bank are required to follow Rule 9(1) of the Security Interest (Enforcement Rules), 2002 under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, in order to protect the interest of auction purchaser also.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

M/S Sumit Traders vs The Debts Recovery Tribunal Drt M.P. And ... on 8 April, 2026

In one of the writ petitions, W.P. No.25138/2021 (M/s Divyadeep Sugar and Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. India Bank and Others), this Court vide order dated 23.11.2021 had issued certain directions to be followed by the borrower as well as by the Bank/Financial Institutions. Hence this writ petition may be disposed of by issuing similer directions.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

Jagdish Sahu vs Pnb Housing Finance Limited on 18 April, 2026

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that Division Bench of this Court, principal seat at Jabalpur vide order dated 08/04/2026 passed in W.P. No. 12618/2026 (Shri Laxminarayan Kachhi and Ors. vs. Hinduja Housing Finance Limited and Ors.), wherein, learned Division Bench considering the earlier order dated 23/11/2021 passed in W.P. No. 25138/2021 ( M/s. Divyadeep Sugar and Industries Private Limited and Ors. vs. India Bank and Ors.) issued certain directions to protect the interest of the borrower for the time being till interim application is decided by full functinal DRT.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Pathak - Full Document

M/S Maa Associates vs Hdfc Bank on 20 April, 2026

In one of the writ petitions, W.P. No.25138/2021 (M/s Divyadeep Sugar and Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. India Bank and Others), this Court vide Signature Not Verified Signed by: TARUN KUMAR SALUNKE Signing time: 20-04-2026 16:27:13 NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:30388 3 WP-13720-2026 order dated 23.11.2021 has issued certain directions to be followed by the borrower as well as by the Bank/Financial Institutions.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

M/S Surendra Kumar Jain Through Its ... vs Axis Bank Limited on 21 April, 2026

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that DRT, Jabalpur is not functional because Presiding Officer has demitted the office and in absence of Presiding Officer, matter is referred to DRT, Lucknow, but there is no member available in the Lucknow DRT. Therefore, in the conspectus of facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners are rendered remediless. Tehsildar intends to proceed against the petitioners because of conclusion of proceedings by the District Magistrate under section 14 of SARFESI Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that Division Bench of this Court, principal seat at Jabalpur vide order dated 08/04/2026 passed in W.P. No. 12618/2026 ( Shri Laxminarayan Kachhi and Ors. vs. Hinduja Housing Finance Limited and Ors.), wherein, learned Division Bench considering the earlier order dated 23/11/2021 passed in W.P. No. 25138/2021 (M/s. Divyadeep Sugar and Industries Private Limited and Ors. vs. India Bank and Ors.) issued certain directions to protect the interest of the borrower for the time being till interim application is decided by full functinal DRT.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Pathak - Full Document
1   2 3 Next