Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.18 seconds)

Pratibha Parihar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through ... on 22 January, 2018

of Corruption Act. During investigation of that crime it was found that Vimal Kumar Gangwal earned many immovable and movable properties by misusing his post by unfair means and deposited unaccounted money in the bank in his name and also in the name of his wife Meena Gangwal, son Nitin Gangwal and second wife present applicant Pratibha Parihar @ Pratibha Gangwal. The legal income of Vimal Kumar Gangwal for the check period from 12.6.1980 to 7.10.2010 from his salary and other sources is Rs.1,25,74,906/- and expenditure is of Rs.1,00,70,012.00 during the same period. While properties worth Rs.1,48,56,008/- were found with them, which is 118% excess from his legal income. It was also inferred by the EOW that movable and immovable property and pecuniary resources found in the possession of his wife Meena Gangwal, son Nitin Gangwal and second wife present applicant Pratibha Parihar @ Pratibha Gangwal actually belong to Vimal Gangwal. So, EOW, Indore filed charge sheet against Vimal Kumar Gangwal, his wife Meena Gangwal, son Nitin Gangwal and second wife present applicant Pratibha Parihar @ Pratibha Gangwal. On that charge-sheet Special Case no.9/16 was registered against the applicant and other co-accused.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1