Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 284 (1.05 seconds)
Documents citing Prithvi Raj vs State Election Commission And Ors. on 25 July, 2007

Sat Paul Goyal vs Ut Of Chandigarh & Ors on 15 December, 2016

A Full Bench of this Court in Prithvi Raj vs. State Election Commission, Punjab and others, AIR 2007 P&H 178 has held that the jurisdiction of this Court stands barred, when a notification under Section 13-A of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 is issued. Section 13-A of the Municipal Act, 1911 is pari materia to Section 7-A. Therefore, the writ petition after the publication of notification under Section 7-A of the Act is not maintainable.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 2 - A K Mittal - Full Document

Paramjit Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab And Others on 6 June, 2012

In Prithvi Raj Vs. State Election Commission, Punjab and others, AIR 2007 P&H 178, a Full Bench of this Court has held that the jurisdiction of this Court stands barred when a notification under Section 13-A of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 is issued. It has further been held that Section 13-A of the Municipal Act, 1911 is pari materia to Section 7-A of the Act. Therefore, the present writ petition after issuance of notification under Section 7-A of the Act is not maintainable.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepak Jain And Others vs State Of Punjab And Others on 10 May, 2012

In view of the judgments referred to above, the present writ petitions have not merit. The same are accordingly dismissed." Faced with such situation, the learned counsel for the petitioners argued that non rotation of the wards is not a ground to challenge the election by way of election petition after the election is complete. Therefore, such rotation of wards can be challenged by the petitioners at this stage before the elections are held. It is also argued that since elections schedule has not been published, therefore, it can not be said CWP No. 8753 of 2012 5 that election process has started.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 3 - H Gupta - Full Document

Atithpal Singh And And Others vs State Of Punjab And Others on 11 December, 2025

7. The other decision relied upon by the petitioners in the case of 'Prithvi Raj vs. State Election Commission, Punjab', too does not assist the petitioners since the Full Bench decided not to interfere in the election process due to the Constitutional bar under Article 243-O (relating to municipal elections), which is similar and identical to the Constitutional bar in respect of Panchayat election under Article 243-ZG.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next