Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (1.60 seconds)Documents citing
Vidya Wati vs Hans Raj on 8 February, 1993
Courts vs M/S Janak International on 8 December, 2010
(i) Krishna Wati Vs. Hans Raj, 1974 (2) Supreme Court Reports 524, in
this case the appellant took a lease of shop premises from the respondent.
From the time of letting, a chemist's business was carried on in the shop by
S with the occasional help of the appellant. S and the appellant were living
as husband and wife to the knowledge of the respondent. The respondent
applied under s. 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, for eviction of the
appellant on the ground that she had sublet the premises to S. The Rent
Controller and the Tribunal on appeal held that the appellant and S were
10
living together as husband and wife, and that therefore there was no
question of any subletting by the appellant. In second appeal, holding that
two substantial questions of law were involved namely, one relating to the
status of the appellant as the wife of S, and the other, whether subletting
was established, the Hon'ble High Court concluded that there was subletting
in favour of S. On the question whether the appellant was legally married no
finding was necessary in the eviction suit. It was sufficient for the rent court
to proceed on the finding that the appellant and S were living together as
husband and wife, whether they were legally married or not.
Punjab Singh And Anr. vs Narinder Singh And Ors. on 14 November, 2007
5. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants has challenged the order by placing reliance on the judgment of this Court in the case of Padma Wati v. Hans Raj and Ors. (1976) 78 P.L.R. 917 wherein this Court has been pleased to lay down as under:
1