Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.31 seconds)

Sajja Subhash Chandra Bose vs Mr. Kota Satyanarayana on 21 June, 2024

(2022) 7 SCC 384 3 (2021) 11 SCC 200 14 Dr. VRKS, J A.S.No.754 of 2010  That Ex.A.1 is an unregistered agreement for sale dated 13.11.2000. In State of Andhra Pradesh by Act 4 of 1999 with effect from 01.04.1999 Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908 was amended and now as per Section 17(g) of the Act an agreement for sale of immovable property of value Rs.100/- and upwards is a compulsorily registerable document. Since Ex.A.1 is unregistered, the suit for specific performance ought to have been dismissed by the trial Court. The document which is compulsorily registerable and is not registered is inadmissible in evidence. For this purpose, learned counsel cited Sardar Singh v. Smt. Krishna Devi4 and Suraj Lamp and Industries (Private) Limited Through Director v. State of Haryana5.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepak vs State Of Haryana on 8 January, 2025

3. The petitioner was earlier represented by Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate who has withdrawn his power of attorney, as evident from the zimini orders (Annexure P-2). As such, it is apparent on record that the petitioner was not granted any opportunity to cross-examine the material witnesses which is essential for the just decision of the case. Further, the denial of fair opportunity to cross-examine the material witnesses would be violative of the right of the petitioner as enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India as well as the provisions contained under Section 240 (2) of Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner further relies upon the judgments of this Court passed in 'Mohd. Nazar Vs. Mohd. Ilyas' CR No.312 of 2014 decided on 11.02.2016 and 'Tosiba Industries Ltd. and others Vs. State of Haryana and another' 2016 (1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 683.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1