Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (1.05 seconds)
Documents citing Shreedhar Govind Kamerkar vs Yeshwant Govind Kamerkar on 18 December, 2014

Kankanala Shyam Sunder vs Moluguri Venkateswarlu on 22 April, 2026

(d) As regards the decisions in Shreedhar Govind Kamerkar (supra) and Rajendra Bajoria (supra), relied upon by Respondent No. I to contend that the cause of action for dissolution continues as long as the partnership business is carried on, these decisions are distinguishable. In Shreedhar Govind Kamerkar, the Supreme Court was dealing with a suit filed within the limitation period, where the question was whether the tenancy right formed part of the assets of the partnership. In Rajendra Bajoria, the Calcutta High Court was dealing with a suit for dissolution of a firm whose business was admittedly still continuing. In the present case, Plaintiff himself issued a dissolution notice dated 30.08.2019 intimating that the partnership firm stood dissolved immediately upon receipt of the notice. Plaintiff cannot now contend that the partnership is still 25 subsisting when he himself has asserted its dissolution. A party cannot approbate and reprobate.
Telangana High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - N Bheemapaka - Full Document
1