Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.23 seconds)

Urmila Devi vs Ajay Kumar Rai on 29 November, 2022

2. On service of summons the defendant no. 1 only has appeared and filed written statement taking preliminary objection that the present suit is not maintainable and the allegations of the plaintiff qua availing of loan of alleged Suit No. 25571/16 Urmila Devi Vs. Ajay Kumar Rai Page no.3/24 amount of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only), execution of title documents in favour of defendant are all contrary and require filing of suit for foreclosure of mortgage and the plaintiff has no cause of action to file the present suit and the plaintiff has not approached the court with clean hands and has suppressed true and material facts from the court as he has concealed that her husband had taken a loan of Rs. 6,65,950/- (Rupees Six Lakh Sixty Five Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty Only) from the defendant for construction of his house and considering the relations between the parties, the plaintiff advanced the said amount and a total amount of Rs. 6,65,950/- (Rupees Six Lakh Sixty Five Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty Only) was paid, Rs. 4,65,950/- (Rupees Four Lakh Sixty Five Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty Only) was paid by cash on 10.04.2013 and Rs. 2,00,000/- in cash on 15.04.2013, in presence of a common friend and it was agreed by the husband of the plaintiff herein that he will return the loan amount before 14.02.2014. The agreement was executed by the plaintiff's husband on dated 15.04.2013 at Mohan Garden, New Delhi in presence of the witness/common friend namely Sh. Krishan Kumar, R/o: H.No. 41A, Street No. 16, Sai Enclave, New Delhi and he had handed over all the original deeds and documents relating to the suit property and it was mentioned in the agreement that the defendant will hand over the property documents qua suit property back to the plaintiff after receiving loan amount on the date decided by both the parties.
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1