Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.20 seconds)

R. Govindaswamy vs The State (Circle Inspector Of Police) on 4 August, 1959

12. Before leaving the case, I may also observe that Section 436, Cr.PC. does not authorise the Sessions Judge to direct further inquiry by a particular Magistrate. The learned Sessions Tudge ought to have directed the District Magistrate by him if or by a Subordinate Magistrate to make the further inquiry, leaving the Dist. Magistrate a discretion as to the selection of the Magistrate. See Ramaswami Thevar v. M. Subban A.I.R. 1930 Mad 983.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R. Govindaswamy vs The State (Circle Inspector Of Police, ... on 4 August, 1959

12. Before leaving the case, I may also observe that Section 436, Cr. P. C. does not authorise the Sessions Judge to direct further inquiry by a particular Magistrate. The learned Sessions fudge ought to have directed the District Magistrate by himself or by a Subordinate Magistrate to make the further inquiry, leaving the Dist. Magistrate a discretion as to the selection of the Magistrate. See Ramaswami Thevar v. M. Subban, AIR 1930 Mad 983.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 25 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1