Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.52 seconds)
Documents citing Vimla Devi And Ors. vs Chaman And Ors. on 18 September, 1991

Halki Bai And Anr. vs New India Assurance Co. Ltd. And Ors. on 25 September, 1997

6. Mr. R.D. Goyal, Advocate appealing for the appellants has placed reliance on the authorities of Manjula Devi Bhuta v. Manjusri Raha 1968 ACJ 1 (MP); State of Orissa v. Archana Nayak 1987 ACJ 772 (Orissa); and Vimla Devi v. Chaman 1992 ACJ 1048 (Rajasthan), for seeking support of the contention that the widow would be entitled to receive the compensation, even after her remarriage, for the period she had not remarried.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

United India Insurance Company Limited vs Eda Anjanamma And Ors. on 22 August, 2003

16. The learned Counsel for the respondent-claimant relied on a judgment of the Rajasthan High Court in Vimala Devi v. Chaman, 1992 ACJ 1048 (Rajasthan) wherein a learned Single Judge held that the compensation assessed on the basis of the principles of assessment cannot be reduced on account of remarriage or prospects of remarriage of the widow which will be against the spirit of Constitution and will put a check on the remarriage system provided under various legislations. On the contrary, an incentive should be given for remarriage for preservation of better society.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 17 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Parasmal Oswal And Ors. vs Gurucharan Singh And Ors. on 13 July, 2006

9. There appears to be no jurisdiction for drpriving the claimants of just compensation on account of loss of dependency as well as loss of contribution and loss of estate. The fact that widow had remarried after two years of the death of victim cannot be applied in the manner that compensation towards her would be restricted only for those two years of widowhood. The decision of this Court in Vimla Devi (supra) was cited before the learned Judge of the Tribunal wherein this Court has observed that no deduction in compensation can be made on account of remarriage by widow and has made observations even to the extent that an incentive should be given for remarriage for preservation of better society. It has been pointed out that after remarriage generally a woman does not get the same status and benefits of decent life as she used to get earlier and that public feeling requires that there shall not be any deduction on account of possibility of remarriage. It has been entirely unjustified on the part of the learned Judge of the Tribunal to have not even looked inside the said citation.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - D Maheshwari - Full Document
1   2 Next