Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (2.39 seconds)
Documents citing Arun Ashruba Mhaske vs Atmaram Dattu Mhaske And Ors. on 15 March, 2007

Hari Manohar Autee vs Fakirchand Eknath Salve Died Through ... on 16 March, 2017

The learned Civil Judge has not considered in its entirety the judgment rendered in the case of Arun Vs. Atmaram. It was a case where the suit was for partition and separate possession and, therefore, the provisions of Section 54 was applicable. This is a case wherein the issue of partition and separate possession was never involved and the suit was only for delivery of possession ::: Uploaded on - 17/03/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 18/03/2017 01:06:11 ::: Writ Petition No.10660/2015 4 of the immovable property to which the provisions of Order 21 Rule 35 of the Civil Procedure Code applies. Therefore, it is to be stated that the impugned order is passed upon misconception of facts and law and, therefore, it deserves to be quashed and set aside.
Bombay High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S B Shukre - Full Document

Venkatesh Landmark Through Partners vs Amedmal Indrabhan Bhatevada Decd Thru ... on 25 April, 2023

Arun Mhaske's case makes reference to MLR Rules mentioned hereinabove. It was observed that the partition of these lands has to be effected by the Collector or his subordinate officer in accordance with these Rules. The Civil Court determines the shares and putting the decree holder in possession is duty of the Collector. Ordinarily the Civil Court after passing the decree becomes defunct so far as putting the decree holder in actual possession.
Bombay High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - S V Kotwal - Full Document

Concord Co-Operative Housing Society, ... vs Amedmal Bhatwada (Deceased) Thr. Rls. ... on 25 April, 2023

Arun Mhaske's case makes reference to MLR Rules mentioned hereinabove. It was observed that the partition of these lands has to be effected by the Collector or his subordinate officer in accordance with these Rules. The Civil Court determines the shares and putting the decree holder in possession is duty of the Collector. Ordinarily the Civil Court after passing the decree becomes defunct so far as putting the decree holder in actual possession.
Bombay High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - S V Kotwal - Full Document

Venkatesh Landmark vs Amedmal Indrabhan Bhatevade Decd Thr ... on 25 April, 2023

Arun Mhaske's case makes reference to MLR Rules mentioned hereinabove. It was observed that the partition of these lands has to be effected by the Collector or his subordinate officer in accordance with these Rules. The Civil Court determines the shares and putting the decree holder in possession is duty of the Collector. Ordinarily the Civil Court after passing the decree becomes defunct so far as putting the decree holder in actual possession.
Bombay High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - S V Kotwal - Full Document

Irshad Ishaque Shaik vs Amedmal Indrabhan Bhatewada Decd. Thr. ... on 25 April, 2023

Arun Mhaske's case makes reference to MLR Rules mentioned hereinabove. It was observed that the partition of these lands has to be effected by the Collector or his subordinate officer in accordance with these Rules. The Civil Court determines the shares and putting the decree holder in possession is duty of the Collector. Ordinarily the Civil Court after passing the decree becomes defunct so far as putting the decree holder in actual possession.
Bombay High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - S V Kotwal - Full Document

Amedmal Bhatwada (Deceased) Thr. Rls. ... vs Concord Co-Operative Housing Society, ... on 25 April, 2023

Arun Mhaske's case makes reference to MLR Rules mentioned hereinabove. It was observed that the partition of these lands has to be effected by the Collector or his subordinate officer in accordance with these Rules. The Civil Court determines the shares and putting the decree holder in possession is duty of the Collector. Ordinarily the Civil Court after passing the decree becomes defunct so far as putting the decree holder in actual possession.
Bombay High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - S V Kotwal - Full Document

Amedmal Indrabhan Bhatewada Decd. Thr. ... vs Irshad Ishaque Shaik on 25 April, 2023

Arun Mhaske's case makes reference to MLR Rules mentioned hereinabove. It was observed that the partition of these lands has to be effected by the Collector or his subordinate officer in accordance with these Rules. The Civil Court determines the shares and putting the decree holder in possession is duty of the Collector. Ordinarily the Civil Court after passing the decree becomes defunct so far as putting the decree holder in actual possession.
Bombay High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - S V Kotwal - Full Document

Yashcon Urban Development Llp, Thr. ... vs Amedmal Indrabhan Bhatewada ... on 25 April, 2023

Arun Mhaske's case makes reference to MLR Rules mentioned hereinabove. It was observed that the partition of these lands has to be effected by the Collector or his subordinate officer in accordance with these Rules. The Civil Court determines the shares and putting the decree holder in possession is duty of the Collector. Ordinarily the Civil Court after passing the decree becomes defunct so far as putting the decree holder in actual possession.
Bombay High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - S V Kotwal - Full Document

Amedmal Indrabhan Bhatewada ... vs Yashcon Urban Development Llp, Thr. ... on 25 April, 2023

Arun Mhaske's case makes reference to MLR Rules mentioned hereinabove. It was observed that the partition of these lands has to be effected by the Collector or his subordinate officer in accordance with these Rules. The Civil Court determines the shares and putting the decree holder in possession is duty of the Collector. Ordinarily the Civil Court after passing the decree becomes defunct so far as putting the decree holder in actual possession.
Bombay High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - S V Kotwal - Full Document

Irshad Ishaque Shaik vs Amedmal Indrabhan Bhatewada Decd. Thr. ... on 25 April, 2023

Arun Mhaske's case makes reference to MLR Rules mentioned hereinabove. It was observed that the partition of these lands has to be effected by the Collector or his subordinate officer in accordance with these Rules. The Civil Court determines the shares and putting the decree holder in possession is duty of the Collector. Ordinarily the Civil Court after passing the decree becomes defunct so far as putting the decree holder in actual possession.
Bombay High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - S V Kotwal - Full Document
1   2 Next