Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 211 (3.25 seconds)
Documents citing M/S Royal Parasdise Hotel (P) Ltd vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 25 August, 2006

K.Mahesh vs The State Of Telangana on 11 March, 2026

"45. In view of the above discussion, we hold that the Petitioners in the transferred case have failed to make out a case for directing the Respondents 14 to regularize the construction made in violation of the sanctioned plan. Rather, the ratio of the above- noted judgments and, in particular, Royal Paradise Hotel (P) Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Ors. (supra) is clearly attracted in the present case. We would like to reiterate that no authority administering municipal laws and other similar laws can encourage violation of the sanctioned plan. The Courts are also expected to refrain from exercising equitable jurisdiction for regularization of illegal and unauthorized constructions else it would encourage violators of the planning laws and destroy the very idea and concept of planned development of urban as well as rural areas."
Telangana High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Esha Ekta Appartments Chs Ltd.& Ors vs Mun.Corp.Of Mumbai & Ors on 27 February, 2013

45. In view of the above discussion, we hold that the petitioners in the transferred case have failed to make out a case for directing the respondents to regularize the construction made in violation of the sanctioned plan. Rather, the ratio of the above-noted judgments and, in particular, Royal Paradise Hotel (P) Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Ors. (supra) is clearly attracted in the present case. We would like to reiterate that no authority administering municipal laws and other similar laws can encourage violation of the sanctioned plan. The Courts are also expected to refrain from exercising equitable jurisdiction for regularization of illegal and unauthorized constructions else it would encourage violators of the planning laws and destroy the very idea and concept of planned development of urban as well as rural areas.
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 7 - G S Singhvi - Full Document

Shri. Bhausaheb Baban Khedkar vs Maharashtra Industrial Development ... on 2 November, 2018

(emphasis added) 59 As regards regularization of the illegal structures, the Apex Court had an occasion to deal 36 2010 (2) SCC 27 ::: Uploaded on - 03/11/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2018 01:30:46 ::: 86 with the issue in the case of Royal Paradise Hotel Pvt. Ltd vs. State of Haryana and others 37. In paragraph 8, the Apex Court held thus:
Bombay High Court Cites 137 - Cited by 0 - A Oka - Full Document

Mariadassou Philomene Dominique vs The Member Secretary on 11 January, 2019

17. The Government and Board have no power under the Act to regularize illegal construction. The Government and the Board have to act within the four corners of the Puducherry Town and Country Planning Act. In case the authorities have exempted illegal buildings from the provisions of the Act and building bye-laws or regularized the illegal constructions, such actions are justiciable. The illegal constructions are a source of danger to the society and public at large. Therefore, it is open even to the neighbours and public to challenge such illegal constructions and regularization, which are not permitted by law.' 6.2. The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner relies on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court between Royal Paradise Hotel (P) Ltd., V. State of Haryana and Others reported in (2006) 7 SCC 597 at http://www.judis.nic.in 22 Special Pages 601 and 602 wherein at Paragraph Nos.7 and 8, it is observed as under:
Madras High Court Cites 63 - Cited by 0 - M Venugopal - Full Document

The Municipal Commissioner Of ... vs M/S. Vardhaman & Hiranandani ... on 15 November, 2019

"56. In view of the above discussion, we hold that the Petitioners in the transferred case have failed to make out a case for directing the Respondents to regularize the construction made in violation of the sanctioned plan. Rather, the ratio of the above-noted judgments and, in particular, Royal Paradise Hotel (P) Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Ors. (supra) is clearly attracted in the Mohite 40/65 ::: Uploaded on - 15/11/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 16/11/2019 02:42:23 ::: fa165-15with849-19 present case. We would like to reiterate that no authority administering municipal laws and other similar laws can encourage violation of the sanctioned plan. The Courts are also expected to refrain from exercising equitable jurisdiction for regularization of illegal and unauthorized constructions else it would encourage violators of the planning laws and destroy the very idea and concept of planned development of urban as well as rural areas."
Bombay High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - K K Tated - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next